MM13

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Draft Schedule of Main Modifications to Section 2 Colchester Local Plan

Representation ID: 8966

Received: 15/11/2021

Respondent: Colchester United Football Club

Agent: Lawson Planning Partnership

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

We object to the revised wording to Policy SG8 contained within Main Modification 13, which removes the previous reference to responsibility falling to the LPA on all planning matters where a Neighbourhood Plan has failed prior to being made. Full details are contained within the Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd representation letter dated 11th November 2021.

Change suggested by respondent:

It is requested that the second paragraph of Policy SG8 be amended to read as follows: “Once a Neighbourhood Plan is made, this becomes part of the Development Plan. In cases where a Neighbourhood Plan has not been made, responsibility for all planning matters within that area will revert to the Local Planning Authority.” For full details, please see attached representations letter, prepared by Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd, on behalf of Colchester United Football Club, dated 11th November 2021.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation

Object

Draft Schedule of Main Modifications to Section 2 Colchester Local Plan

Representation ID: 8980

Received: 15/11/2021

Respondent: Marden Homes Ltd

Agent: Strutt & Parker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Summary: approach to Neighbourhood Plans unclear and overreliance on their role in the delivery of homes in Tiptree
(See attachment for full representation)

Change suggested by respondent:

See accompanying letter for recommendations

Full text:

See attachment for full representation

Attachments:

Object

Draft Schedule of Main Modifications to Section 2 Colchester Local Plan

Representation ID: 8986

Received: 15/11/2021

Respondent: Bloor Homes

Agent: Strutt & Parker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Policy is now silent in how LPA will respond in event that a Neighbourhood Plan does not materialise – this is unsound. Not considered necessary to remove elements of policy SG8 for soundness. Modification not justified. Mechanism to account for situation where Neighbourhood Plan fails to be made important for Tiptree.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation