Placemaking
Search form responses
Results for CAUSE search
New searchNo answer given
No answer given
No answer given
No answer given
No choices made
No answer given
No answer given
No choices made
No answer given
No choices made
No answer given
No answer given
No choices made
No answer given
No answer given
Our historic settlements, growing proportionately and not threatened by endless urban sprawl Colchester needs to: 1. Look again at brownfield sites, across the entire Borough 2. Look at infrastructure first, not housing first 3. Plan for transit-oriented development, with compact & walkable 15-min developments 4. Stop car-dependent and low-density planning - no new link roads 5. Reduce the housing target - taking into account environmental constraints 6. Carry out a new Strategic Market Housing Assessment and address the needs identified Footnote 27 of the NPPF: 27 In doing so, strategic policies should promote an effective use of land and optimise site densities in accordance with chapter 11. This is to ensure that homes are built in the right places, to prioritise brownfield and other under-utilised urban sites, to utilise existing infrastructure, and to allow people to live near the services they rely on, making travel patterns more sustainable.
No answer given
No answer given
Colchester City Centre, Urban Area of Colchester (outside of City Centre), Large Settlements, Small Settlements
These are silly questions. We can't create employment.
No answer given
No answer given
These are silly questions - we need more choices. The obvious answer is that everyone needs to have good ,affordable, regular, alternatives to car use.
No answer given
The natural environment should be left alone and not over-developed. This question is worded badly as there is a difference between 'green infrastructure' for humans and natural spaces.
Countryside
The ranking exercise above is appalling. We should protect all of the above. I selected only Countryside because it includes all of the above.
Transit-oriented development Co-creation with communities Mixed use High density (not sky rise - terraces & mansion blocks) Varied styles - not the orange boxes that we see on the edge of so many historic villages (e.g at Eight Ash Green on the A1124 which can be seen like blots on the landscape from Fordham) FREIBURG's Vauban & Rieselfeld Dutch Nursery Development in Coggeshall - good example of community consulted development that
No uploaded files for public display
Identikit orange boxes that are an eyesore Car dependent development Low density sprawl Use of green field
No uploaded files for public display
COUNTRYSIDE AND OUR HISTORIC VILLAGES Coggeshall Long Melford Nayland East Bergholt
No answer given
They are invariably: car-dependent green field low density orange boxes
No answer given
No choices made
Walking/cycling routes, Better accessibility to spaces e.g. not reliant on the car to get there
No answer given
No answer given