Placemaking

Search form responses

Results for CAUSE search

New search New search
Form ID: 11087

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No choices made

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No choices made

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No choices made

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No choices made

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Nothing chosen

Our historic settlements, growing proportionately and not threatened by endless urban sprawl Colchester needs to: 1. Look again at brownfield sites, across the entire Borough 2. Look at infrastructure first, not housing first 3. Plan for transit-oriented development, with compact & walkable 15-min developments 4. Stop car-dependent and low-density planning - no new link roads 5. Reduce the housing target - taking into account environmental constraints 6. Carry out a new Strategic Market Housing Assessment and address the needs identified Footnote 27 of the NPPF: 27 In doing so, strategic policies should promote an effective use of land and optimise site densities in accordance with chapter 11. This is to ensure that homes are built in the right places, to prioritise brownfield and other under-utilised urban sites, to utilise existing infrastructure, and to allow people to live near the services they rely on, making travel patterns more sustainable.

Primary Schools , Secondary Schools, Universities, and other educational facilities , Community centres/village halls , Open space, allotments and play areas , Sports clubs and centres , Local shops , Leisure and cultural centres , Cafes, restaurants, bars and pubs/public house , Places of worship and cemeteries , Libraries , Doctors surgeries, dentists, hospitals and other medical centres

No answer given

Parish/Ward

No answer given

Yes

Colchester City Centre, Urban Area of Colchester (outside of City Centre), Large Settlements, Small Settlements

Other

These are silly questions. We can't create employment.

Cycling or wheeling

No answer given

Bus

No answer given

These are silly questions - we need more choices. The obvious answer is that everyone needs to have good ,affordable, regular, alternatives to car use.

Not Applicable

Nothing chosen

No answer given

The natural environment should be left alone and not over-developed. This question is worded badly as there is a difference between 'green infrastructure' for humans and natural spaces.

Countryside

The ranking exercise above is appalling. We should protect all of the above. I selected only Countryside because it includes all of the above.

Transit-oriented development Co-creation with communities Mixed use High density (not sky rise - terraces & mansion blocks) Varied styles - not the orange boxes that we see on the edge of so many historic villages (e.g at Eight Ash Green on the A1124 which can be seen like blots on the landscape from Fordham) FREIBURG's Vauban & Rieselfeld Dutch Nursery Development in Coggeshall - good example of community consulted development that

No uploaded files for public display

Identikit orange boxes that are an eyesore Car dependent development Low density sprawl Use of green field

No uploaded files for public display

COUNTRYSIDE AND OUR HISTORIC VILLAGES Coggeshall Long Melford Nayland East Bergholt

Yes

City Wide

No answer given

Very dissatisfied

They are invariably: car-dependent green field low density orange boxes

Yes

No answer given

No choices made

Walking/cycling routes, Better accessibility to spaces e.g. not reliant on the car to get there

No answer given

Lack of segregated pathways

No answer given

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.