Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Colchester Local Plan
Regulation 18
Land Northwest of the Fire Station,
Wivenhoe
On behalf of
Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch
January 2026
CONSULTATION
RESPONSE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................................1
2. THE SITE.......................................................................................................................................................................5
3. POLICY PP24...............................................................................................................................................................7
4. POLICY GN5, SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL AND EVIDENCE BASE.................................................................19
5. CONCLUSION ...........................................................................................................................................................24
Appendix A - Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4............................................................................................26
Appendix B – Recommended Amendments to Policy PP24...................................................................................27
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
1 | P a g e
1. INTRODUCTION
Background
1.1 This representation is prepared on behalf of Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch (the
Promoters) in respect of the Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18
Consultation.
1.2 In January 2024 Ceres Property were instructed to make ‘Call for Sites’ submissions in respect of
three land parcels on the northern side of Wivenhoe (Site IDs: 10755, 10757 & 10756). The
submissions were accompanied by a Constraints and Opportunities Plan which was submitted in
support of potential development sites, and is reproduced at Figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Constraints and Opportunities Plan
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
2 | P a g e
1.3 For Wivenhoe, Policy PP24 proposes to allocate Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Colchester Road,
Wivenhoe for approximately 175 homes. This is predominantly the southern land parcel shown on
Figure 1 above, and subject to some revisions and commentary as set out below, is the focus of this
representation.
1.4 This representation provides formal comments on the draft policies within the plan considered
relevant to our client’s interests, in particular Policy PP24.
1.5 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
principle of the inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. They welcome the opportunity to work with
Planning Officers to further refine the Policy and ensure that the site is both a developable and
deliverable housing opportunity.
1.6 While they are obviously disappointed the other two land parcels have not been proposed as
allocations, we would like to confirm that they are both still available, either in their entirety or in
part for inclusion in the emerging plan, in the event further sites are required to meet the Council’s
substantial housing needs and ensure there is a sufficient supply of sites to do this over the plan
period.
Policy Context
1.7 In preparing these representations, regard has been had to the National Planning Policy Framework,
December 2024 (NPPF). Paragraph 11 of the NPPF sets out:
Plans and decisions should apply a presumption in favour of sustainable development.
For plan-making this means that:
a) all plans should promote a sustainable pattern of development that seeks to: meet
the development needs of their area; align growth and infrastructure; improve the
environment; mitigate climate change (including by making effective use of land in urban
areas) and adapt to its effects;
b) strategic policies should, as a minimum, provide for objectively assessed needs for
housing and other uses, as well as any needs that cannot be met within neighbouring
areas, unless:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
3 | P a g e
i. the application of policies in this Framework that protect areas or assets of particular
importance provides a strong reason for restricting the overall scale, type, or distribution
of development in the plan area; or
ii. any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the
benefits, when assessed against the policies in this Framework taken as a whole.…
1.8 Section 3 of the NPPF relates to ‘plan-making’. Paragraph 15 of the NPPF promotes a plan-led
system, and that succinct and up-to-date plans should provide a positive vision for the future of
each area; a framework for addressing housing needs and other economic, social and
environmental policies; and a platform for local people to shape their surroundings.
1.9 Paragraph 16 states that Plans should:
a) be prepared with the objective of contributing to the achievement of sustainable
development;
b) be prepared positively, in a way that is aspirational but deliverable;
c) be shaped by early, proportionate and effective engagement between plan -
makers and communities, local organisations, businesses, infrastructure
providers and operators and statutory consultees;
d) contain policies that are clearly written and unambiguous, so it is evident how a
decision maker should react to development proposals;
e) be accessible through the use of digital tools to assist public involvement and
policy presentation; and
f) serve a clear purpose, avoiding unnecessary duplication of policies that apply to
a particular area (including policies in this Framework, where relevant).
1.10 As set out at paragraph 36, local plans are examined to assess whether they have been prepared in
accordance with legal and procedural requirements, to determine whether they can be considered
‘sound’. The test for soundness as set out within the NPPF requires that Plans are:
a) Positively prepared
b) Justified
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
4 | P a g e
c) Effective
d) Consistent with national policy
1.11 By way of background to the Council’s preparation of the emerging Local Plan, it is acknowledged
that the Council’s current five year land supply is increasingly marginal.
1.12 In February 2026 the existing Adopted Section 1 Local Plan becomes five years old, and the housing
requirement within it will accordingly be out of date for the purposes of calculation of five year
housing land supply as set by NPPF paragraph 232. At this point in time the Council accept that they
will be unable to demonstrate a five year housing land supply and this situation is unlikely to be
rectified until the adoption of the new Local Plan.
1.13 The housing land supply annual requirement will therefore become approximately 1,300 dwellings
per annum in line with the standard method, as opposed to 920 dpa within the existing adopted
Local Plan. Over a five year period this will add 1,900 homes to the required supply, plus the required
buffer.
1.14 The Council acknowledges this requirement at paragraph 3.36 of the Regulation 18 Consultation
document, confirming that the requirement for 20,800 new homes over the plan period is a
mandatory target (or minimum target [emphasis added] ) which must be planned for. At present
the draft Plan proposes to deliver 21,106 new homes which equates to a headroom of just 1.1%.
There is also a significant Affordable Housing need in the Borough, which the 2024 Housing Needs
Assessment indicates equates to 877 affordable dpa. Both these factors suggest that it is likely that
the Regulation 19 Plan will need to establish a higher total requirement figure, not only to provide
an appropriate buffer of a minimum 5% but also to boost overall numbers to help address acute
affordable housing needs.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
5 | P a g e
2. THE SITE
2.1 On 7th February 2025 the Council published papers for the Local Plan Committee meeting to be
held on 17th February which included a full draft of the Regulation 18 Preferred Options Local Plan
and the inclusion of Policy PP24. While at that time the resolution to publish the plan for consultation
was not agreed, the draft Plan sought to allocate sufficient sites to provide for 1,300 dwellings per
year across the new Plan period to 2041. For Wivenhoe, Policy PP24 proposed to allocate Land
Northwest of the Fire Station for approximately 175 homes.
2.2 As stated above, Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcomed the proposed inclusion of the
Land Northwest of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Local Plan. Having reviewed draft
Policy PP24, the Promoters have been working with their consultant team to progress further
technical work to help support the Site’s early delivery. Updated plans and technical notes/reports
have now been produced to provide further evidence to support the Site’s inclusion as both a
developable and deliverable opportunity. These confirm that, a development with the following
description could be brought forward;
A proposed residential development of approximately 200 dwellings with land for a new
community space, associated public open space, landscaping , and infrastructure.
2.3 A positive meeting with officers from the Council’s Planning Policy Team was held on 16th December
2025 to provide an update on the progress which has been made to date. The following documents
were provided to the Council ahead of the meeting:
• Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Wivenhoe Constraints and Opportunities Context Plan – COP-01 P4: Produced by Thrive
Architects
• Concept Master Plan Option 1 – CMP-02 P7: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Concept Master Plan Option 2 – CMP-02 P8: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Land Budget Plan Option 1 – LBP-02 P7: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Land Budget Plan Option 2 – LBP-02 P8: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Proposed Access – 1255-TA11: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
6 | P a g e
• Arboricultural Impact Plan – OE-002 October 2025: Produced by Origin Environmental
• Technical Note – Highways: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
• Indicative Attenuation Requirement – 1255-FRA03 Rev A: Produced by Martin Andrews
Consulting
• Technical Note – Flood Risk and Drainage: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
• Landscape & Visual Technical Note – October 2025: Produced by Aspect Landscape Planning
• Preliminary Ecological Appraisal – September 2025: Produced by Blackstone Ecology Ltd
2.4 Apart from the Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4 (at Appendix A) these have not been reprovided as part of the consultation response; however, further copies can be made available if
required.
2.5 Following the submission of this representation it is the Promoters intention to work up a formal
pre-application submission to help further develop the detail of site proposals ahead of the potential
submission of an outline application later in the year, which will help to confirm that the Site is
developable and provide a clearer indication of when housing delivery may actually commence.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
7 | P a g e
3. POLICY PP24
Supporting Text
3.1 The supporting text for Policy PP24 is set out at paragraph 12.24 of the draft Plan. This confirms that
Wivenhoe benefits from a good range of infrastructure including a mainline train station, GP surgery,
two primary schools, numerous shops and restaurants, and abundant open space provision. It also
benefits from public transport connections to Colchester and a good cycle and footpath network
which provides good connections to the University of Essex, amongst other destinations. As such,
the Town can be acknowledged as a sustainable location, in line with the Plans development strategy
for the accommodation of further growth.
3.2 Paragraph 12.24 also acknowledges there are a number of environmental constraints which
reasonably restrict the opportunities for the town’s expansion to the south, east, and west, which
confirms the only logical direction for some proportionate growth is to the north.
3.3 There is also a made neighbourhood plan for Wivenhoe, the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan
(Adopted May 2019), which has helped to guide development in the past, whilst safeguarding the
surrounding environmentally sensitive areas. Whilst this is part of the Development Plan, it is now
over five years old and as such the weight which can be attributed to its policies will need to be
moderated to reflect the increased local housing requirement.
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
3.4 The requirements of Policy PP24 are set out in turn below with comments and responses provided
to each of the relevant criteria. Overall, the allocation is supported with the proposal for
approximately 175 new homes, or more to make the most efficient use of the Site, considered
appropriate, given the sustainability of the settlement, and Wivenhoe’s position in the Borough’s
settlement hierarchy. There are, however, a number criteria within the Policy which it is considered
might be better worded, require clarification, or are not actually considered to be necessary to
enable the effective delivery of the allocation.


Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
8 | P a g e
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
In addition to the infrastructure and mitigation requirements identified in Policy ST 7 and subject to
compliance with all other relevant policies, development will be supported on land within the area
identified on the policies map which provides:
3.5 As referred to above the extent of the Site boundary (red line) has been reviewed as part of the
current scheme development; in particular having regard to the landscape, ecological and access
technical work which has been completed to date. Some revisions to the Site boundary are now
proposed and these are included on the accompanying Site Plan SLP-01 P4 which is attached at
Appendix A. The extent of the Site and development boundary shown on the draft policies map we
consider should be updated to reflect the full extent of the amended site area, which is 8.828
hectares.
3.6 The amendments can be summarised as follows:
• The northern boundary: Has been adjusted to the north along Colchester Road to deliver a
better development relationship with Feedhams Close on the west side of Colchester Road
and provide a more logical settlement boundary along the northern part of the town while
allowing the slightly enlarged site to deliver an appropriate and efficient quantum of
development, reflecting the sustainability of Wivenhoe as a location. This also helps to better
accommodate the required access visibility splay to the north and provide a stronger gateway
into the settlement. Along the northern boundary from an ecological and biodiversity point of
view, it is also important to include a 5m buffer on the north side of existing hedgerow, ditch,
and tree cover, for enhancement and management purposes, however this area will not
include any built development.
• Southern boundary: This includes the track to allotments and the former care home site.
• Eastern boundary: This follows the title plan.
• Western boundary: This follows the edge of the new of allotment site.
3.7 While these changes will marginally increase the size of the site, they help to facilitate it delivering at
least the anticipated quantum of development, without compromising the ability to retain and
improve the existing important landscape trees, hedges, and ditches, and also ensure that the
biodiversity value of these features can be maximised in the long term.
a) Approximately 175 new dwellings of a mix and type of housing to meet evidenced needs and be
compatible with surrounding development;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
9 | P a g e
3.8 Criteria a) is supported, however there does need to be some flexibility in respect of the total
number of dwellings which can be delivered. Currently two different development options are being
developed, one which reflects the pylons which cross the site as being retained, and a second which
reflects Policy criterion j) showing them undergrounded. At present these options confirm that 175
dwellings are likely to be below the minimum number of dwellings the Site can deliver and in reality,
higher numbers will be achievable in order to make the most efficient use of the land available in
this sustainable location.
3.9 Both Concept Master Plan options seek to retain existing landscape features, primarily the existing
field boundaries. A single point of access is provided to Colchester Road with a main spine road
running through the Site and providing an all modes connection to the north-west corner of the
Cala Homes development.
3.10 To provide a vehicle connection between the eastern half of the Site and the west, it will be necessary
to remove a short central section of the existing hedgerow. This will be kept to a minimum and
compensatory planting will be carried out. Additional pedestrian connectivity has also been
provided to assist the integration of the Care Home land, the Cala development, the new allotments,
and the wider Site.
3.11 Generous areas of landscaping and green space have been included, with green buffers to existing
landscape features throughout. The landscaping will help to establish an appropriate rural character
to the scheme and some separation between the internal development parcels, reflective of the
Site’s edge of settlement location.
3.12 On the western side of the Site a surface water attenuation basin is proposed which can be gravity
fed from the remainder of the development area. This will also be located close to the existing
attenuation basin which serves the Cala development, and the new allotment site to the west,
creating a large natural space, rich in habitat value and adding a tranquil area to the setting of the
new allotments.
3.13 The Promoters architects are currently refining the site option plans to ensure that an efficient use
of the site can be delivered at an appropriate density to reflect the landscape sensitivity of the site,
however, the early indications are that a higher number of dwellings is likely to be deliverable and
as such it is recommended that the figure of approximately 175 dwellings is slightly increased to
approximately 200 dwellings. When the additional design work has been completed, we will provide
the Council with an update of the most realistic site capacity, to help inform the next stage of the
emerging Plan.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
10 | P a g e
b) Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point of vehicle access to
be via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority and
demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety;
3.14 It is noted that criteria (b) of Policy PP24 seems to suggest that the; ‘…point of vehicle access to be via
the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation…’ The existing access to the Cala development is
physically constrained by the existing buildings in Watsham Place and as such it is not considered
that it would be desirable in highway terms for it to serve approximately 260 dwellings.
3.15 As part of the scheme development process, it has therefore been concluded that providing a new
point of access further north along Colchester Road would deliver substantial highway safety and
amenity benefits, reducing the potential for congestion around the junctions of Vine Drive and
Elmstead Road. Additional pedestrian and cycle connections can be provided directly to Colchester
Road, as part of this new access, as well as to the new track to the allotments, in the south-east
corner of the Site frontage as well. A vehicle link to the Cala development is also proposed which
ultimately will create a loop through both sites. This will improve the over permeability of both sites.
3.16 In respect of the location of the new Site access on Colchester Road, a central location is considered
to be the only feasible option to serve the development. This is because there is not scope to locate
the access to the south due to the separation distance required from the Elmstead Road junction
and the controlled crossing, meaning there are no suitable non constrained alternative locations. A
Highway Technical Note and accompanying plans have already been provided to the Planning Policy
Team and further copies can be made available upon request. As the scheme development is
progressed engagement with Essex County Council Highways will be undertaken to help confirm
the technical acceptability of these arrangements.
3.17 It is therefore recommended that criterion b) should be amended to the following:
Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point (s) of vehicle access to be
via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority and
demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety .
3.18 The Promoters would be happy to discuss this or another form of suitable access with the Council.
c) Provide a safe pedestrian access to ensure connectivity within and throughout the site to existing
footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green infrastructure connections and
recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel links and connections to the
settlement;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
11 | P a g e
3.19 This criterion appears to be trying to address three matters, which are generally related, however,
the reference to green infrastructure connections is considered confusing as these connections are
not only associated with accessibility but also green and blue corridors where it may be more
appropriate to discourage public activity from an ecological perspective. Furthermore, there are no
public rights of way crossing, or immediately adjoining the site. It is therefore recommended that
criteria c) is amended as follows:
c) Provide a safe pedestrian and active travel access to ensure connectivity within and throughout the
site and to the settlement and surrounding area . Connections to existing footways and the track to
the allotments and where possible recreational access to the countryside should also be considered .
to existing footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green infrastructure
connections and recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel links and
connections to the settlement;
3.20 The delivery of green infrastructure connections can be secured through the statutory requirements
to deliver biodiversity net gain and the general layout of the development.
3.21 If the reference to green infrastructure connections was intended to suggest that public access
should not only be provided through the urban parts of the development, but also through more
informal rural settings, then this can be explained as part of the supporting text.
d) Contributions towards enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields;
3.22 There is no objection to this particular criterion. While the emerging scheme which is being
developed for the Site will provide the minimum 10% open space requirement currently operated
by the Council, given the size of the development it is unlikely that this will include any formal sports
facilities, and as such it is appropriate that some mitigation should be delivered providing this is not
already captured as part of the Council’s CIL charging schedule.
e) Screening comprising locally appropriate tree belts and/or hedgerows will be required along the
site boundaries to ensure that development is sensitively integrated into the landscape and to
maintain settlement separation;
3.23 This is a reasonable requirement, and the current scheme development is being informed by an
accompanying landscape strategy which seeks to retain existing hedgerows and tree belts with
appropriate buffers and introduce new tree belts and/or hedgerows where necessary along the Site
boundaries to ensure the Site is sensitively integrated into the townscape.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
12 | P a g e
f) Biodiversity enhancement measures should include enhancing hedgerow condition and
establishing grassland habitats along road verges;
3.24 There is no particular objection to this policy criteria, however, given the statutory biodiversity
enhancement requirements which will be secured through the detailed planning application stage
and a statutory biodiversity net gain condition, it is unclear why there is a site specific requirement
for establishing grassland habitats along road verges in this particular location. As such these
comments might be better included in the supporting text of policy where further explanation and
justification can be provided.
3.25 It is therefore considered that unless there is site specific justification available this criterion should
be deleted.
g) Development must conserve, and where appropriate, enhance the significance of heritage assets
(including any contribution made by their settings). Designated heritage assets close to the
allocated site includes five Grade II Listed Buildings as informed by the stage 1 HIA;
3.26 This is in line with national policy and legislative requirements which require heritage assets to be
conserved or enhanced, not conserved and enhanced. It is considered that the Site can be
developed to ensure that the setting of the nearby listed buildings are, as a minimum, preserved.
3.27 It is noted that the Heritage Impact Assessment Sift Methodology (January 2025) classified the site
as not requiring any further investigation at this stage but indicates that a proportionate heritage
impact assessment, desk-based archaeological assessment and potentially trial trenching, should
be part of the planning application stage.
h) The total number of dwellings will be spread between this site and the area currently set aside
for a care home as part of the neighbourhood plan allocation;
This criterion is supported as it will provide clarity in respect of the status of the Neighbourhood
Plan as part of the development plan and the Site’s existing designation for use as a care home.
3.28 Following the original outline permission (Ref: 213507) in January 2024 for the adjoining housing
site, which included permission for a 60 bed care home, the site was marketed and Cala Homes
purchased the residential element, however, very little interest was expressed in the Care Home
site. More recently, in October 2024, a focused marketing exercise commenced for the care home
land. Over twenty operators were contacted directly, however, despite the extensive marketing, only
one operator expressed any serious interest, and after a more detailed review concluded the site
was not suitable for their requirements.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
13 | P a g e
3.29 It is also relevant that the care home land to the rear of the Fire Station was not the only opportunity
for care home provision to be made by the Neighbourhood Plan. At paragraph 16.35, the
Neighbourhood Plan notes this and states: “Whether proposals for care homes come forward will
depend on market factors.” Furthermore, the Council have recently resolved to grant planning
permission (Ref: 240409) at the Croquet Gardens site for 25 Bungalows and a 60-Bed Care Home.
Therefore, the care home land to the rear of the Fire Station is not required or suitable for care
home use to meet any current local need and, as such, there is sufficient justification for its logical
inclusion as part of the residential allocation.
3.30 This is also recognised in the Summary of Sites Evidence (October 2025) evidence base document
as set out in Section 4 below.
i) A new community space must be included within the site and pedestrian access to the adjacent
allotments must be created;
3.31 The Site Promoters would be agreeable to including a community space/land as part of the scheme
development, however, there needs to be a clear vision around what is actually necessary,
proportionate, and justified.
3.32 At the present time, this criterion is considered to be imprecise in respect of the size and type of
community space which is required and is lacking justification.
3.33 While pedestrian access will clearly be provided to the adjacent allotments through the inclusion of
the allotment access track, this can also be secured under criterion c) above.
3.34 Having regard to the limited information in the Infrastructure Audit and Delivery Plan (October 2025)
(IADP), which it is acknowledged does refer to a limited range of community facilities at Table 3.25
(Page 69). However, it does not expand this any further and explain which community facilities there
are a shortage of. It is noted that those facilities listed in the introduction to section seem to relate
to buildings such as community halls and libraries rather than ‘spaces’.
3.35 While the Sustainability Appraisal refers to this as a potential community benefit for residents in the
north of the settlement, it fails to provide any further guidance what is expected.
3.36 The reference in the IADP does not seem to align with the assessment set out in the Settlement
Evidence Stage 1 Document (November 2024). This evidence document includes an analysis of
Wivenhoe (Page 108 onwards) which generally confirms that it is a sustainable location with a good
range of community facilities and local services. This does not suggest a shortage of community
buildings. At Page 109 it states:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
14 | P a g e
“There is numerous community and social infrastructure in Wivenhoe. There is a GP
surgery, dentist surgeries, shops including a One Stop, Co -op and numerous
independent shops. There is a library , three hair salons and three barbers, art galleries.
There are nine public houses/restaurants, four cafes, a fish and chip shop, football
ground, tennis courts, cricket ground, bowls club, allotments and open space provision
including playing fields. Ther e are multiple churches and community halls .” [emphasis
added]
3.37 Under the section on High Level Opportunities (at a settlement level), whilst it suggests that growth
may provide opportunities to enhance local infrastructure, including active travel within the
settlement and beyond, there is no mention of a need for additional community spaces or buildings.
There is, however, reference to the Wivenhoe Green Spaces Community Project which
demonstrates how a mosaic of sites of varying sizes contribute to the green infrastructure of the
town and encourage diversity of wild flowers on green spaces, bringing significant ecological, climate,
and heritage benefits.
3.38 As referred to above, noting that the Council is a CIL charging authority and 25% of CIL receipts will
be transferred directly to Wivenhoe Parish Council to spend on local projects, there does not appear
to be any reasonable justification for this criterion at present.
3.39 Furthermore, criterion d) indicates there is a particular need for contributions towards the
enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields which it is assumed would be
secured separately to CIL, through a Section 106 Agreement. Requiring the Site to deliver a further
additional community space or land as well as a contribution to this existing community recreation
space is not considered reasonable or proportionate to the scale of the proposed development. As
such it is not likely to be compliant with the tests set out in the CIL Regulations without further
appropriate site-specific justification.
3.40 In respect of the current scheme development work, without more precise understanding of what
a community space may be required to deliver it is difficult to understand where it might be best
located on the site, the type and extent of land required, the potential neighbouring impact it may
have and what accessibility requirements may be necessary. It would therefore be extremely helpful
to have further clarification on this matter if the criterion is to be retained.
3.41 In summary, at the present time it is therefore considered that criterion i) should be deleted or
further site specific justification should be provided.
j) Opportunities for undergrounding should be explored
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
15 | P a g e
3.42 There is no objection to this criterion. At the beginning of July 2025 notice was served by the
landowner on Eastern Power Networks Plc that their Wayleave Agreement which crosses the Site,
will be terminated on 15th January 2026. This is the first step towards potentially securing the
ungrounding of the existing overhead power lines. However, at this stage it is not known whether
this is a realistically viable option. As such, as referred to above, two layout options, with and without
undergrounding, have been prepared and are being developed further.
3.43 It should also be noted that there is a mains sewer which follows the alignment of the existing Pylons
which means the two different schemes do not vary dramatically with a linear open space running
through the Site, even if the existing overhead power lines were to be undergrounded. This is not
to say there would not be visual and environmental benefits from fully exploring the opportunity for
undergrounding.
k) Development must discharge attenuated surface water to a receiving waterbody and not to the
combined sewer network, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no other option.
3.44 There is no objection to this criterion. A drainage strategy is being prepared as part of the scheme
development and, as referred to above, a technical note, Flood Risk and Drainage has already been
provided to the Council which confirms that surface water can be discharged to an appropriately
sized attenuation basin on site. A further copy of this technical note can be provided if required.
l) Demonstrate adequate capacity for managing wastewater including proposed phasing
requirements or alternative solutions to the satisfaction of the Council and Anglian Water;
3.45 As referred to above, a drainage strategy to inform the scheme development is being developed
and this will include engagement with Anglian Water.
3.46 Although as a statutory consultee, consultation would undoubtedly take place in connection with
this and other criteria, it is the local planning authority (not Anglian Water or any other body) that
makes the final decision on planning applications, accordingly it is inappropriate for Anglian to be
included in the Policy. References to the need for consultation and capacity issues if they exist can
be included in the support text.
3.47 It is relevant to note that Anglian Water have been raising issues up and down the country, objecting
to development due to insufficient capacity, and these objections are being further tested through
the courts. However, the law is clear that Anglian Water has a duty under the Water Industry Act
1991, to accept connections to the public sewer which they accept; the current issue is where there
is a shortage of headroom in the receiving waste water recycling centre (WRC), the speed at which
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
16 | P a g e
appropriate capacity can be delivered. Clearly, through a plan led system, there should not be a
problem for the sewage undertaker to align its asset management upgrade programme, a five year
cycle, with the housing trajectory proposed through a Local Plan and early engagement by site
promoters as well as the local planning authority will assist with this. This is clearly a matter which
should also be addressed through the infrastructure delivery plan and in turn needs to be linked to
the Council’s housing trajectory.
3.48 In conclusion the reference to Anglian Water in criterion l) should be deleted.
m) A range of measures in addition to prioritising SuDs (Policy EN8) and water efficiency measures
to reduce the risk on impact on the WRC capacity as a result of planned growth including:
i. Removal of unrequired network flows;
ii. Targeted education to include new residents of the development;
iii. Reduction in the demand for potable water.
3.49 It is unclear why this particular criterion has been included given the requirements for a site specific
flood risk assessment and drainage strategy, which would need to be in accordance with Policy EN8
and cover the items listed as i) to iii) above. In addition, as referred to in the comments above in
respect of criterion l) consultation with Anglian Water will be required and the above issues will be
addressed through this mechanism. It will also be linked to the infrastructure delivery plan and
housing trajectory.
3.50 It is considered that it would be more appropriate for this matter to be referred to in the supporting
text rather than as an additional policy element.
3.51 Criterion m) should be deleted.
n) Any site specific infrastructure requirements from the IDP (likely to include education provision,
highway mitigation, water and wastewater and specific community / open space provision).
3.52 There is no objection to this particular criterion, however, any site specific infrastructure
requirements will need to meet the statutory requirements as set out in Regulation 122 of the CIL
Regulations 2010 (as amended) i.e. be:
(a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms;
(b) directly related to the development; and
(c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development .
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
17 | P a g e
3.53 This will be particularly important bearing in mind that the Council is already a CIL charging authority
and there should be no double counting when considering infrastructure and mitigation.
3.54 In the national policy context of producing succinct local plans, as a general good practice comment
including this requirement does seem to be an unnecessary “belt and braces” approach, given the
reference to Policy ST7 in the introduction to the Policy, as well as the requirements set out in the
other criteria discussed above.
3.55 In conclusion it is recommended that criterion n) is deleted.
o) Before granting planning consent, wintering bird surveys will be undertaken at the appropriate
time of year to identify any offsite functional habitat. In the unlikely event that significant numbers
are identified, development must firstly avoid impacts. Where this is not possible, development
must be phased to deliver habitat creation and management either on or off-site to mitigate any
significant impacts. Any such habitat must be provided and fully functional before any
development takes place which would affect significant numbers of SPA birds
3.56 There is no objection to this criterion given the environmental sensitivities of the surrounding
protected sites. As part of the scheme development, ecologically assessments have been carried
out including bird surveys which were undertaken during January, February, and March 2025. These
confirmed that any use of the site by waterfowl was negligible. These results are included in the
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal which has already been provided to the Council. This assessment is
further supported by the surveys previously undertaken in relation to the CALA and Care Home site
which are also still relatively recent, albeit now out of date, but again not identifying any particular
concerns.
3.57 These conclusions are also supported by the Emerging Allocations Biodiversity Assessment as
referred to in Section 5 below.
All development Proposals within Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan Area, will also be determined
against the policies in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan (Adopted May 2019) where they are up
to date and relevant.
3.58 There is no objection to the final paragraph of the Policy which acknowledges the existence of the
Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan, which will remain part of the development plan for the area. This
helpfully confirms that the weight attached to its policies for decision making purposes in the future
will need to be moderated having regard to its age, consistency with the Local Plan strategic policies,
and national planning policy at the time of the determination of any future planning application
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
18 | P a g e
PP24 Summary
3.59 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. While the above section includes some relatively detailed
commentary in respect of the particular criteria and wording of Policy PP24, these are not intended
to be a criticism, but a positive review to assist the Council with the drafting of the forthcoming
version of the Policy and supporting text to be included in the Regulation19 submission version of
the Plan, to help ensure that the Plan can be found sound on examination with limited modification.
3.60 A track change version of Policy PP24 has been provided at Appendix B capturing the recommended
amendments set out above. In conclusion this representation supports Policy PP24 subject to the
recommended refinements and minor amendment to the Site area as indicated at Appendix A,
ensuring flexibility, clarity, and deliverability of the Site in the early part of the Plan period.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
19 | P a g e
4. POLICY GN5, SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL AND EVIDENCE BASE
Policy GN5: Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace
4.1 It is noted that the emerging Plan, includes Policy GN5: Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace. This
policy requires that the Natural England standard of 8 hectares per 1000 head of population be
applied where it is necessary to provide alternative greenspace as the result of a Habitat Regulations
Assessment. It is proposed that the policy wording should be reviewed to allow flexibility in the
application of this ratio, as opposed to an arbitrary calculation, and consideration should be given to
only applying it strategic scale development for example, over 1,000 dwellings.
4.2 On the basis that we would anticipate that an HRA for this particular site (Policy PP24) would be likely
to identify an impact on locally sensitive sites, we would suggest that a further consideration should
be given as to how the Council anticipate this standard might be delivered, noting that the direct
application of this standard to the Site would require an additional area of 3.36 ha of Greenspace to
be provided.
4.3 Such a requirement in addition to the existing land take to meet open space standards, on site SUDs
and on site BNG, would result in a significant reduction in the current housing potential, making the
current policy proposal for 175 dwellings unrealistic. This standard may also have a serious impact
on the viability on this Site and other similar proposed allocations
4.4 Furthermore, sites in Colchester do of course make RAMs contributions to seek to manage
recreational disturbance pressures, so again, this is a factor that should be taken into account
alongside the Natural England ratio which may not consider local factors such as this and effectively
result in double counting in conflict with the CIL Regulations.
Sustainability Appraisal Report (February 2025)
4.5 Both the Site and the wider allocation (PP24) have been considered within the evidence base
documents to the emerging Local Plan, including the Sustainability Appraisal Report (February 2025)
(the SA) which assesses whether the emerging Local Plan will help achieve sustainable development
when compared with reasonable alternatives.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
20 | P a g e
4.6 The SA confirms that Wivenhoe is a sustainable settlement and has good infrastructure provision
and is one of the four largest towns beyond the City of Colchester. However, it also indicates that the
proportion of growth directed to Wivenhoe and West Mersea is lower than the other two larger
settlements of Marks Tey and Tiptree owing to the internationally important biodiversity
designations.
4.7 At Table 5.36, a summary of the SA findings in respect of Policy PP24 is provided and expanded upon
at Paragraphs 5.323 to 5.329. It is considered that this provides a fair assessment of the Policy based
on the existing evidence base. It is noted that the conclusion is that no recommendations are
proposed for any changes to the Policy. In respect of the assessment, some of the areas where
negligible effects have been recorded, for example in respect of the historic environment (SA
Objective 7), Biodiversity and Geodiversity (SA Objective 8) and Landscape (SA Objective 9) a higher
score may well be achieved following the completion of the Site specific technical assessments
currently being undertaken by the Promoters, which will provide further detail and clarification on
the potential positive mitigation which can be delivered.
4.8 In conclusion, it is considered that the SA provides a robust assessment of the proposed allocations
and polices in the emerging plan. It has considered a comprehensive range of reasonable
alternatives, identified suitable and relevant options, and as such, is supported.
Summary of Sites Evidence (October 2025)
4.9 As part of the evidence base for the emerging Local Plan, the Council have produced a Summary of
Sites Evidence (October 2025) which contains a summary of the sites assessed as part of developing
the new Local Plan for housing and employment. These sites were collated via a ‘Call for sites’
exercise or a desktop review, with sites then assessed using the Strategic Land Availability
Assessment (SLAA). The Summary report also confirms that in bringing forward site allocation
choices within the Preferred Options Local Plan, other evidence base documents were used to
inform the suitability of sites.
4.10 The Site is considered under the name ‘Land North of the Fire Station’ Wivenhoe (Site Ref: 10755)
along with the other site submissions for the settlement. As part of the assessment the submitted
Site has been extended to include the ‘Care Home Land’ to the south. This amendment is supported
by the Promoters, however as referred to above a further modest increase in the site area as
discussed above and identified on the red line plan at Appendix A would also be beneficial.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
21 | P a g e
4.11 While the assessment acknowledges that the proposed allocation encroaches into the coalescence
area designated in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan, it helpfully acknowledges that the
encroachment is less than other proposals. It would be useful if the assessment were to highlight
that the allocation does not extend any further north along Colchester Road into the coalescence
break area than the northern boundary of the existing settlement around Feedhams Close on the
west side of Colchester Road when this report is updated next. It will also be necessary for it to reflect
the revised red line plan included at Appendix A.
4.12 The assessment also helpfully acknowledges that:
“The site is adjacent to one of the neighbourhood plan allocations and development can
be planned to complement that development, including delivering some of the homes
allocated on part of the existing allocation set aside for a care home, which is no lon ger
needed owing to the proposal for a care home on an alternative site in Wivenhoe. Access
can be made to the allotments to be delivered as part of the existing allocation
(currently with outline consent).”
4.13 This clarification is supported and considered helpful.
Emerging Allocations Biodiversity Assessment
4.14 The emerging allocations biodiversity assessment has undertaken a review of the proposed
allocation which is set out on page 60 of the report. The harm scoring is noted as:
“Little/no harm – the site has limited natural habitat value”
4.15 This assessment is supported and the general commentary is considered to be a fair reflection of
the Sites biodiversity value and potential, having regard to the site-specific ecological, arboricultural,
and landscape technical work which has recently been completed by the Site Promoters.
Heritage Impact Assessment Sift (January 2025)
4.16 The Heritage Impact Assessment Sift Methodology (January 2025) was a desk-based assessment of
each site to identify any heritage assets with the potential to be affected by their allocation. Following
the sift, three levels of further heritage impact assessment are recommended depending on the
potential impact of the allocation of a site on the historic environment. These were categorised as:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
22 | P a g e
• No further assessment: (the allocation of the site has been assessed to have no effect on the
significance of any heritage assets);
• Proforma Heritage Impact Assessment; and
• Detailed Heritage Impact Assessment.
4.17 The Land North of the Fire Station was assessed to fall within the first category, no further
assessment required and this conclusion is supported given the limited proximity of the nearest
designated heritage assets.
4.18 It is acknowledged that the site assessment indicates that a heritage statement will be required to
inform the layout of the site and scale of development, given the listed buildings in Colchester Road.
It is also noted that the assessment indicates that a desk-based archaeological assessment will be
required, potentially supported by trial trenching.
Colchester Infrastructure Audit and Delivery Plan, October 2025 (IADP)
4.19 The IADP at Table 2-3 indicates the planned housing growth over the plan period, for Wivenhoe
years 1-5 there are 175 houses planned. The opportunity for the Site to come forward early in the
plan period is supported and its ability to contribute fully to the Council’s ability to demonstrate a
five year housing land supply at the point of adoption is welcomed. As referred to elsewhere in this
consultation response, the Promoters are actively working towards the submission of an outline
application later this year (2026) to ensure that this delivery timetable is not delayed.
4.20 The above further demonstrates the suitability, availability, and deliverability of the Site for
residential development.
4.21 Appendix A of the IADP at Project ID 159 Transport, under Active Travel identifies the Wivenhoe
Mobility Hub as Phase 2, delivery 2029-2033, at an unfunded cost of £506,880 and continues under
the Funding Sources
Funding not secured. Developer funding expected from S106 and/or S278. Potential grant funding
routes include BSIP and LuF Proposed Funding Split - 100% contribution from preferred
allocations - 0% contribution from reference case developments - 0% contribut ion from external
grants.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
23 | P a g e
4.22 Clearly this a project which will not only benefit the future occupants of the Policy PP24 allocation,
but also the existing residents of Wivenhoe and the wider area. From the table it is unclear which
allocations are expected to contribute to this particular infrastructure upgrade. Having regard to the
CIL Tests what the reasonable and propionate financial contribution would be expected from the
development allocations, it is assumed that the reference to ‘0% contribution from reference case
developments ’ means this will be pooled contribution and a modest contribution is that would be
expected as a from development of the Site (Policy PP24).

Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
24 | P a g e
5. CONCLUSION
5.1 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. They welcome the opportunity to work with Planning Officers to
further refine the Policy and ensure that the Site is both a developable and deliverable housing
opportunity and can be delivered in in the early part of the plan period, helping the Council
demonstrate a five year housing land supply upon adoption.
5.2 Wivenhoe is a sustainable settlement and is one of the four largest towns beyond the City of
Colchester and an appropriate location to direct development in accordance with the Council’s
proposed development strategy which is supported along with the robust approach adopted by the
Sustainability Appraisal.
5.3 The draft Plan confirms that Wivenhoe benefits from a good range of infrastructure, including a
mainline train station, GP surgery, two primary schools, numerous shops and restaurants, and
abundant open space provision. It also benefits from public transport connections to Colchester
and a good cycle and footpath network which provide good connections to the University of Essex
amongst other destinations. As such, the Town can be acknowledged as a sustainable location, in
line with the Plans development strategy for the accommodation of further growth. This is
welcomed.
5.4 It is the Promoter’s intention to work up a formal pre-application submission to help further develop
the details of the Site proposals ahead of the potential submission of an outline application later in
the year, which will help to confirm that the Site is developable and provide a clearer indication of
when housing delivery will be likely to commence.
5.5 The Promoters consider that this represents an exciting opportunity for them to deliver a high
quality housing scheme which responds to the established environmental character of the
settlement edge and provides a range of modern homes in a beautiful, green, and sustainable
location, to meet the needs of the growing local community. Delivering a development which will
foster a strong sense of community and promote healthy and sustainable life styles, with a lasting
legacy and sense of pride, is a key objective.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
25 | P a g e
5.6 While this represent includes some relatively detailed commentary in respect of the particular
criteria and wording of Policy PP24, these are not intended to be a criticism, but a positive review to
assist the Council with the drafting of the forthcoming version of the Policy and supporting text to
be included in the Regulation19 submission version of the Plan, to help ensure that the Plan can be
found sound on examination with limited modification.
5.7 In summary, the Promoters support the Plan and Sustainability Appraisal along with the Council’s
assessment that the Site is suitable, available, and achievable within the plan period. Its early delivery
will also strengthen the Plan’s housing trajectory and the future five year housing land supply. This
representation supports Policy PP24 subject to the recommended refinements to the wording
recommended in Section 3 above and captured in track changes version of the Policy included at
Appendix B, as well minor amendment to the Site area (increased to 8.828 hectares) as indicated in
the Plan at Appendix A.
5.8 Inclusion of these amendments will help to ensure flexibility, clarity, and this representation aims to
confirm the deliverability of the Site in the early part of the Plan period.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
26 | P a g e
Appendix A - Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4
Proposed Amended Site Area


Revised Site Area Approximately 8.828 hectares

Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
27 | P a g e
Appendix B – Recommended Amendments to Policy
PP24
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
In addition to the infrastructure and mitigation requirements identified in Policy ST 7 and subject to
compliance with all other relevant policies, development will be supported on land within the area
identified on the policies map which provides:
a. Approximately 200 new dwellings of a mix and type of housing to meet evidenced needs and be
compatible with surrounding development;
b. Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point(s) of vehicle access
to be via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority
and demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety;
c. Provide a safe pedestrian and active travel access to ensure connectivity within and throughout
the site and to the settlement and surrounding area. Connections to existing footways and the
track to the allotments and where possible recreational access to the countryside should also be
considered. to existing footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green
infrastructure connections and recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel
links and connections to the settlement;
d. Contributions towards enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields;
e. Screening comprising locally appropriate tree belts and/or hedgerows will be required along the
site boundaries to ensure that development is sensitively integrated into the landscape and to
maintain settlement separation;
f. Biodiversity enhancement measures should include enhancing hedgerow condition and
establishing grassland habitats along road verges;
g. Development must conserve, and where appropriate, enhance the significance of heritage assets
(including any contribution made by their settings). Designated heritage assets close to the
allocated site includes five Grade II Listed Buildings as informed by the stage 1 HIA;
h. The total number of dwellings will be spread between this site and the area currently set aside
for a care home as part of the neighbourhood plan allocation;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
28 | P a g e
i. A new community space must be included within the site and pedestrian access to the adjacent
allotments must be created;
j. Opportunities for undergrounding should be explored;
k. Development must discharge attenuated surface water to a receiving waterbody and not to the
combined sewer network, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no other option.
l. Demonstrate adequate capacity for managing wastewater including proposed phasing
requirements or alternative solutions to the satisfaction of the Council and Anglian Water;
m. A range of measures in addition to prioritising SuDs (Policy EN8) and water efficiency measures
to reduce the risk on impact on the WRC capacity as a result of planned growth including:
i. Removal of unrequired network flows;
ii. Targeted education to include new residents of the development;
iii. Reduction in the demand for potable water.
n. Any site specific infrastructure requirements from the IDP (likely to include education provision,
highway mitigation, water and wastewater and specific community / open space provision).
o. Before granting planning consent, wintering bird surveys will be undertaken at the appropriate
time of year to identify any offsite functional habitat. In the unlikely event that significant numbers
are identified, development must firstly avoid impacts. Where this is not possible, development
must be phased to deliver habitat creation and management either on or off-site to mitigate any
significant impacts. Any such habitat must be provided and fully functional before any
development takes place which would affect significant numbers of SPA birds.
All development Proposals within Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan Area, will also be determined against
the policies in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan (Adopted May 2019) where they are up to date and
relevant.

Colchester Local Plan
Regulation 18
Land Northwest of the Fire Station,
Wivenhoe
On behalf of
Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch
January 2026
CONSULTATION
RESPONSE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................................1
2. THE SITE.......................................................................................................................................................................5
3. POLICY PP24...............................................................................................................................................................7
4. POLICY GN5, SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL AND EVIDENCE BASE.................................................................19
5. CONCLUSION ...........................................................................................................................................................24
Appendix A - Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4............................................................................................26
Appendix B – Recommended Amendments to Policy PP24...................................................................................27
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
1 | P a g e
1. INTRODUCTION
Background
1.1 This representation is prepared on behalf of Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch (the
Promoters) in respect of the Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18
Consultation.
1.2 In January 2024 Ceres Property were instructed to make ‘Call for Sites’ submissions in respect of
three land parcels on the northern side of Wivenhoe (Site IDs: 10755, 10757 & 10756). The
submissions were accompanied by a Constraints and Opportunities Plan which was submitted in
support of potential development sites, and is reproduced at Figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Constraints and Opportunities Plan
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
2 | P a g e
1.3 For Wivenhoe, Policy PP24 proposes to allocate Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Colchester Road,
Wivenhoe for approximately 175 homes. This is predominantly the southern land parcel shown on
Figure 1 above, and subject to some revisions and commentary as set out below, is the focus of this
representation.
1.4 This representation provides formal comments on the draft policies within the plan considered
relevant to our client’s interests, in particular Policy PP24.
1.5 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
principle of the inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. They welcome the opportunity to work with
Planning Officers to further refine the Policy and ensure that the site is both a developable and
deliverable housing opportunity.
1.6 While they are obviously disappointed the other two land parcels have not been proposed as
allocations, we would like to confirm that they are both still available, either in their entirety or in
part for inclusion in the emerging plan, in the event further sites are required to meet the Council’s
substantial housing needs and ensure there is a sufficient supply of sites to do this over the plan
period.
Policy Context
1.7 In preparing these representations, regard has been had to the National Planning Policy Framework,
December 2024 (NPPF). Paragraph 11 of the NPPF sets out:
Plans and decisions should apply a presumption in favour of sustainable development.
For plan-making this means that:
a) all plans should promote a sustainable pattern of development that seeks to: meet
the development needs of their area; align growth and infrastructure; improve the
environment; mitigate climate change (including by making effective use of land in urban
areas) and adapt to its effects;
b) strategic policies should, as a minimum, provide for objectively assessed needs for
housing and other uses, as well as any needs that cannot be met within neighbouring
areas, unless:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
3 | P a g e
i. the application of policies in this Framework that protect areas or assets of particular
importance provides a strong reason for restricting the overall scale, type, or distribution
of development in the plan area; or
ii. any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the
benefits, when assessed against the policies in this Framework taken as a whole.…
1.8 Section 3 of the NPPF relates to ‘plan-making’. Paragraph 15 of the NPPF promotes a plan-led
system, and that succinct and up-to-date plans should provide a positive vision for the future of
each area; a framework for addressing housing needs and other economic, social and
environmental policies; and a platform for local people to shape their surroundings.
1.9 Paragraph 16 states that Plans should:
a) be prepared with the objective of contributing to the achievement of sustainable
development;
b) be prepared positively, in a way that is aspirational but deliverable;
c) be shaped by early, proportionate and effective engagement between plan -
makers and communities, local organisations, businesses, infrastructure
providers and operators and statutory consultees;
d) contain policies that are clearly written and unambiguous, so it is evident how a
decision maker should react to development proposals;
e) be accessible through the use of digital tools to assist public involvement and
policy presentation; and
f) serve a clear purpose, avoiding unnecessary duplication of policies that apply to
a particular area (including policies in this Framework, where relevant).
1.10 As set out at paragraph 36, local plans are examined to assess whether they have been prepared in
accordance with legal and procedural requirements, to determine whether they can be considered
‘sound’. The test for soundness as set out within the NPPF requires that Plans are:
a) Positively prepared
b) Justified
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
4 | P a g e
c) Effective
d) Consistent with national policy
1.11 By way of background to the Council’s preparation of the emerging Local Plan, it is acknowledged
that the Council’s current five year land supply is increasingly marginal.
1.12 In February 2026 the existing Adopted Section 1 Local Plan becomes five years old, and the housing
requirement within it will accordingly be out of date for the purposes of calculation of five year
housing land supply as set by NPPF paragraph 232. At this point in time the Council accept that they
will be unable to demonstrate a five year housing land supply and this situation is unlikely to be
rectified until the adoption of the new Local Plan.
1.13 The housing land supply annual requirement will therefore become approximately 1,300 dwellings
per annum in line with the standard method, as opposed to 920 dpa within the existing adopted
Local Plan. Over a five year period this will add 1,900 homes to the required supply, plus the required
buffer.
1.14 The Council acknowledges this requirement at paragraph 3.36 of the Regulation 18 Consultation
document, confirming that the requirement for 20,800 new homes over the plan period is a
mandatory target (or minimum target [emphasis added] ) which must be planned for. At present
the draft Plan proposes to deliver 21,106 new homes which equates to a headroom of just 1.1%.
There is also a significant Affordable Housing need in the Borough, which the 2024 Housing Needs
Assessment indicates equates to 877 affordable dpa. Both these factors suggest that it is likely that
the Regulation 19 Plan will need to establish a higher total requirement figure, not only to provide
an appropriate buffer of a minimum 5% but also to boost overall numbers to help address acute
affordable housing needs.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
5 | P a g e
2. THE SITE
2.1 On 7th February 2025 the Council published papers for the Local Plan Committee meeting to be
held on 17th February which included a full draft of the Regulation 18 Preferred Options Local Plan
and the inclusion of Policy PP24. While at that time the resolution to publish the plan for consultation
was not agreed, the draft Plan sought to allocate sufficient sites to provide for 1,300 dwellings per
year across the new Plan period to 2041. For Wivenhoe, Policy PP24 proposed to allocate Land
Northwest of the Fire Station for approximately 175 homes.
2.2 As stated above, Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcomed the proposed inclusion of the
Land Northwest of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Local Plan. Having reviewed draft
Policy PP24, the Promoters have been working with their consultant team to progress further
technical work to help support the Site’s early delivery. Updated plans and technical notes/reports
have now been produced to provide further evidence to support the Site’s inclusion as both a
developable and deliverable opportunity. These confirm that, a development with the following
description could be brought forward;
A proposed residential development of approximately 200 dwellings with land for a new
community space, associated public open space, landscaping , and infrastructure.
2.3 A positive meeting with officers from the Council’s Planning Policy Team was held on 16th December
2025 to provide an update on the progress which has been made to date. The following documents
were provided to the Council ahead of the meeting:
• Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Wivenhoe Constraints and Opportunities Context Plan – COP-01 P4: Produced by Thrive
Architects
• Concept Master Plan Option 1 – CMP-02 P7: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Concept Master Plan Option 2 – CMP-02 P8: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Land Budget Plan Option 1 – LBP-02 P7: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Land Budget Plan Option 2 – LBP-02 P8: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Proposed Access – 1255-TA11: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
6 | P a g e
• Arboricultural Impact Plan – OE-002 October 2025: Produced by Origin Environmental
• Technical Note – Highways: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
• Indicative Attenuation Requirement – 1255-FRA03 Rev A: Produced by Martin Andrews
Consulting
• Technical Note – Flood Risk and Drainage: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
• Landscape & Visual Technical Note – October 2025: Produced by Aspect Landscape Planning
• Preliminary Ecological Appraisal – September 2025: Produced by Blackstone Ecology Ltd
2.4 Apart from the Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4 (at Appendix A) these have not been reprovided as part of the consultation response; however, further copies can be made available if
required.
2.5 Following the submission of this representation it is the Promoters intention to work up a formal
pre-application submission to help further develop the detail of site proposals ahead of the potential
submission of an outline application later in the year, which will help to confirm that the Site is
developable and provide a clearer indication of when housing delivery may actually commence.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
7 | P a g e
3. POLICY PP24
Supporting Text
3.1 The supporting text for Policy PP24 is set out at paragraph 12.24 of the draft Plan. This confirms that
Wivenhoe benefits from a good range of infrastructure including a mainline train station, GP surgery,
two primary schools, numerous shops and restaurants, and abundant open space provision. It also
benefits from public transport connections to Colchester and a good cycle and footpath network
which provides good connections to the University of Essex, amongst other destinations. As such,
the Town can be acknowledged as a sustainable location, in line with the Plans development strategy
for the accommodation of further growth.
3.2 Paragraph 12.24 also acknowledges there are a number of environmental constraints which
reasonably restrict the opportunities for the town’s expansion to the south, east, and west, which
confirms the only logical direction for some proportionate growth is to the north.
3.3 There is also a made neighbourhood plan for Wivenhoe, the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan
(Adopted May 2019), which has helped to guide development in the past, whilst safeguarding the
surrounding environmentally sensitive areas. Whilst this is part of the Development Plan, it is now
over five years old and as such the weight which can be attributed to its policies will need to be
moderated to reflect the increased local housing requirement.
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
3.4 The requirements of Policy PP24 are set out in turn below with comments and responses provided
to each of the relevant criteria. Overall, the allocation is supported with the proposal for
approximately 175 new homes, or more to make the most efficient use of the Site, considered
appropriate, given the sustainability of the settlement, and Wivenhoe’s position in the Borough’s
settlement hierarchy. There are, however, a number criteria within the Policy which it is considered
might be better worded, require clarification, or are not actually considered to be necessary to
enable the effective delivery of the allocation.


Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
8 | P a g e
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
In addition to the infrastructure and mitigation requirements identified in Policy ST 7 and subject to
compliance with all other relevant policies, development will be supported on land within the area
identified on the policies map which provides:
3.5 As referred to above the extent of the Site boundary (red line) has been reviewed as part of the
current scheme development; in particular having regard to the landscape, ecological and access
technical work which has been completed to date. Some revisions to the Site boundary are now
proposed and these are included on the accompanying Site Plan SLP-01 P4 which is attached at
Appendix A. The extent of the Site and development boundary shown on the draft policies map we
consider should be updated to reflect the full extent of the amended site area, which is 8.828
hectares.
3.6 The amendments can be summarised as follows:
• The northern boundary: Has been adjusted to the north along Colchester Road to deliver a
better development relationship with Feedhams Close on the west side of Colchester Road
and provide a more logical settlement boundary along the northern part of the town while
allowing the slightly enlarged site to deliver an appropriate and efficient quantum of
development, reflecting the sustainability of Wivenhoe as a location. This also helps to better
accommodate the required access visibility splay to the north and provide a stronger gateway
into the settlement. Along the northern boundary from an ecological and biodiversity point of
view, it is also important to include a 5m buffer on the north side of existing hedgerow, ditch,
and tree cover, for enhancement and management purposes, however this area will not
include any built development.
• Southern boundary: This includes the track to allotments and the former care home site.
• Eastern boundary: This follows the title plan.
• Western boundary: This follows the edge of the new of allotment site.
3.7 While these changes will marginally increase the size of the site, they help to facilitate it delivering at
least the anticipated quantum of development, without compromising the ability to retain and
improve the existing important landscape trees, hedges, and ditches, and also ensure that the
biodiversity value of these features can be maximised in the long term.
a) Approximately 175 new dwellings of a mix and type of housing to meet evidenced needs and be
compatible with surrounding development;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
9 | P a g e
3.8 Criteria a) is supported, however there does need to be some flexibility in respect of the total
number of dwellings which can be delivered. Currently two different development options are being
developed, one which reflects the pylons which cross the site as being retained, and a second which
reflects Policy criterion j) showing them undergrounded. At present these options confirm that 175
dwellings are likely to be below the minimum number of dwellings the Site can deliver and in reality,
higher numbers will be achievable in order to make the most efficient use of the land available in
this sustainable location.
3.9 Both Concept Master Plan options seek to retain existing landscape features, primarily the existing
field boundaries. A single point of access is provided to Colchester Road with a main spine road
running through the Site and providing an all modes connection to the north-west corner of the
Cala Homes development.
3.10 To provide a vehicle connection between the eastern half of the Site and the west, it will be necessary
to remove a short central section of the existing hedgerow. This will be kept to a minimum and
compensatory planting will be carried out. Additional pedestrian connectivity has also been
provided to assist the integration of the Care Home land, the Cala development, the new allotments,
and the wider Site.
3.11 Generous areas of landscaping and green space have been included, with green buffers to existing
landscape features throughout. The landscaping will help to establish an appropriate rural character
to the scheme and some separation between the internal development parcels, reflective of the
Site’s edge of settlement location.
3.12 On the western side of the Site a surface water attenuation basin is proposed which can be gravity
fed from the remainder of the development area. This will also be located close to the existing
attenuation basin which serves the Cala development, and the new allotment site to the west,
creating a large natural space, rich in habitat value and adding a tranquil area to the setting of the
new allotments.
3.13 The Promoters architects are currently refining the site option plans to ensure that an efficient use
of the site can be delivered at an appropriate density to reflect the landscape sensitivity of the site,
however, the early indications are that a higher number of dwellings is likely to be deliverable and
as such it is recommended that the figure of approximately 175 dwellings is slightly increased to
approximately 200 dwellings. When the additional design work has been completed, we will provide
the Council with an update of the most realistic site capacity, to help inform the next stage of the
emerging Plan.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
10 | P a g e
b) Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point of vehicle access to
be via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority and
demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety;
3.14 It is noted that criteria (b) of Policy PP24 seems to suggest that the; ‘…point of vehicle access to be via
the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation…’ The existing access to the Cala development is
physically constrained by the existing buildings in Watsham Place and as such it is not considered
that it would be desirable in highway terms for it to serve approximately 260 dwellings.
3.15 As part of the scheme development process, it has therefore been concluded that providing a new
point of access further north along Colchester Road would deliver substantial highway safety and
amenity benefits, reducing the potential for congestion around the junctions of Vine Drive and
Elmstead Road. Additional pedestrian and cycle connections can be provided directly to Colchester
Road, as part of this new access, as well as to the new track to the allotments, in the south-east
corner of the Site frontage as well. A vehicle link to the Cala development is also proposed which
ultimately will create a loop through both sites. This will improve the over permeability of both sites.
3.16 In respect of the location of the new Site access on Colchester Road, a central location is considered
to be the only feasible option to serve the development. This is because there is not scope to locate
the access to the south due to the separation distance required from the Elmstead Road junction
and the controlled crossing, meaning there are no suitable non constrained alternative locations. A
Highway Technical Note and accompanying plans have already been provided to the Planning Policy
Team and further copies can be made available upon request. As the scheme development is
progressed engagement with Essex County Council Highways will be undertaken to help confirm
the technical acceptability of these arrangements.
3.17 It is therefore recommended that criterion b) should be amended to the following:
Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point (s) of vehicle access to be
via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority and
demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety .
3.18 The Promoters would be happy to discuss this or another form of suitable access with the Council.
c) Provide a safe pedestrian access to ensure connectivity within and throughout the site to existing
footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green infrastructure connections and
recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel links and connections to the
settlement;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
11 | P a g e
3.19 This criterion appears to be trying to address three matters, which are generally related, however,
the reference to green infrastructure connections is considered confusing as these connections are
not only associated with accessibility but also green and blue corridors where it may be more
appropriate to discourage public activity from an ecological perspective. Furthermore, there are no
public rights of way crossing, or immediately adjoining the site. It is therefore recommended that
criteria c) is amended as follows:
c) Provide a safe pedestrian and active travel access to ensure connectivity within and throughout the
site and to the settlement and surrounding area . Connections to existing footways and the track to
the allotments and where possible recreational access to the countryside should also be considered .
to existing footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green infrastructure
connections and recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel links and
connections to the settlement;
3.20 The delivery of green infrastructure connections can be secured through the statutory requirements
to deliver biodiversity net gain and the general layout of the development.
3.21 If the reference to green infrastructure connections was intended to suggest that public access
should not only be provided through the urban parts of the development, but also through more
informal rural settings, then this can be explained as part of the supporting text.
d) Contributions towards enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields;
3.22 There is no objection to this particular criterion. While the emerging scheme which is being
developed for the Site will provide the minimum 10% open space requirement currently operated
by the Council, given the size of the development it is unlikely that this will include any formal sports
facilities, and as such it is appropriate that some mitigation should be delivered providing this is not
already captured as part of the Council’s CIL charging schedule.
e) Screening comprising locally appropriate tree belts and/or hedgerows will be required along the
site boundaries to ensure that development is sensitively integrated into the landscape and to
maintain settlement separation;
3.23 This is a reasonable requirement, and the current scheme development is being informed by an
accompanying landscape strategy which seeks to retain existing hedgerows and tree belts with
appropriate buffers and introduce new tree belts and/or hedgerows where necessary along the Site
boundaries to ensure the Site is sensitively integrated into the townscape.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
12 | P a g e
f) Biodiversity enhancement measures should include enhancing hedgerow condition and
establishing grassland habitats along road verges;
3.24 There is no particular objection to this policy criteria, however, given the statutory biodiversity
enhancement requirements which will be secured through the detailed planning application stage
and a statutory biodiversity net gain condition, it is unclear why there is a site specific requirement
for establishing grassland habitats along road verges in this particular location. As such these
comments might be better included in the supporting text of policy where further explanation and
justification can be provided.
3.25 It is therefore considered that unless there is site specific justification available this criterion should
be deleted.
g) Development must conserve, and where appropriate, enhance the significance of heritage assets
(including any contribution made by their settings). Designated heritage assets close to the
allocated site includes five Grade II Listed Buildings as informed by the stage 1 HIA;
3.26 This is in line with national policy and legislative requirements which require heritage assets to be
conserved or enhanced, not conserved and enhanced. It is considered that the Site can be
developed to ensure that the setting of the nearby listed buildings are, as a minimum, preserved.
3.27 It is noted that the Heritage Impact Assessment Sift Methodology (January 2025) classified the site
as not requiring any further investigation at this stage but indicates that a proportionate heritage
impact assessment, desk-based archaeological assessment and potentially trial trenching, should
be part of the planning application stage.
h) The total number of dwellings will be spread between this site and the area currently set aside
for a care home as part of the neighbourhood plan allocation;
This criterion is supported as it will provide clarity in respect of the status of the Neighbourhood
Plan as part of the development plan and the Site’s existing designation for use as a care home.
3.28 Following the original outline permission (Ref: 213507) in January 2024 for the adjoining housing
site, which included permission for a 60 bed care home, the site was marketed and Cala Homes
purchased the residential element, however, very little interest was expressed in the Care Home
site. More recently, in October 2024, a focused marketing exercise commenced for the care home
land. Over twenty operators were contacted directly, however, despite the extensive marketing, only
one operator expressed any serious interest, and after a more detailed review concluded the site
was not suitable for their requirements.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
13 | P a g e
3.29 It is also relevant that the care home land to the rear of the Fire Station was not the only opportunity
for care home provision to be made by the Neighbourhood Plan. At paragraph 16.35, the
Neighbourhood Plan notes this and states: “Whether proposals for care homes come forward will
depend on market factors.” Furthermore, the Council have recently resolved to grant planning
permission (Ref: 240409) at the Croquet Gardens site for 25 Bungalows and a 60-Bed Care Home.
Therefore, the care home land to the rear of the Fire Station is not required or suitable for care
home use to meet any current local need and, as such, there is sufficient justification for its logical
inclusion as part of the residential allocation.
3.30 This is also recognised in the Summary of Sites Evidence (October 2025) evidence base document
as set out in Section 4 below.
i) A new community space must be included within the site and pedestrian access to the adjacent
allotments must be created;
3.31 The Site Promoters would be agreeable to including a community space/land as part of the scheme
development, however, there needs to be a clear vision around what is actually necessary,
proportionate, and justified.
3.32 At the present time, this criterion is considered to be imprecise in respect of the size and type of
community space which is required and is lacking justification.
3.33 While pedestrian access will clearly be provided to the adjacent allotments through the inclusion of
the allotment access track, this can also be secured under criterion c) above.
3.34 Having regard to the limited information in the Infrastructure Audit and Delivery Plan (October 2025)
(IADP), which it is acknowledged does refer to a limited range of community facilities at Table 3.25
(Page 69). However, it does not expand this any further and explain which community facilities there
are a shortage of. It is noted that those facilities listed in the introduction to section seem to relate
to buildings such as community halls and libraries rather than ‘spaces’.
3.35 While the Sustainability Appraisal refers to this as a potential community benefit for residents in the
north of the settlement, it fails to provide any further guidance what is expected.
3.36 The reference in the IADP does not seem to align with the assessment set out in the Settlement
Evidence Stage 1 Document (November 2024). This evidence document includes an analysis of
Wivenhoe (Page 108 onwards) which generally confirms that it is a sustainable location with a good
range of community facilities and local services. This does not suggest a shortage of community
buildings. At Page 109 it states:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
14 | P a g e
“There is numerous community and social infrastructure in Wivenhoe. There is a GP
surgery, dentist surgeries, shops including a One Stop, Co -op and numerous
independent shops. There is a library , three hair salons and three barbers, art galleries.
There are nine public houses/restaurants, four cafes, a fish and chip shop, football
ground, tennis courts, cricket ground, bowls club, allotments and open space provision
including playing fields. Ther e are multiple churches and community halls .” [emphasis
added]
3.37 Under the section on High Level Opportunities (at a settlement level), whilst it suggests that growth
may provide opportunities to enhance local infrastructure, including active travel within the
settlement and beyond, there is no mention of a need for additional community spaces or buildings.
There is, however, reference to the Wivenhoe Green Spaces Community Project which
demonstrates how a mosaic of sites of varying sizes contribute to the green infrastructure of the
town and encourage diversity of wild flowers on green spaces, bringing significant ecological, climate,
and heritage benefits.
3.38 As referred to above, noting that the Council is a CIL charging authority and 25% of CIL receipts will
be transferred directly to Wivenhoe Parish Council to spend on local projects, there does not appear
to be any reasonable justification for this criterion at present.
3.39 Furthermore, criterion d) indicates there is a particular need for contributions towards the
enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields which it is assumed would be
secured separately to CIL, through a Section 106 Agreement. Requiring the Site to deliver a further
additional community space or land as well as a contribution to this existing community recreation
space is not considered reasonable or proportionate to the scale of the proposed development. As
such it is not likely to be compliant with the tests set out in the CIL Regulations without further
appropriate site-specific justification.
3.40 In respect of the current scheme development work, without more precise understanding of what
a community space may be required to deliver it is difficult to understand where it might be best
located on the site, the type and extent of land required, the potential neighbouring impact it may
have and what accessibility requirements may be necessary. It would therefore be extremely helpful
to have further clarification on this matter if the criterion is to be retained.
3.41 In summary, at the present time it is therefore considered that criterion i) should be deleted or
further site specific justification should be provided.
j) Opportunities for undergrounding should be explored
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
15 | P a g e
3.42 There is no objection to this criterion. At the beginning of July 2025 notice was served by the
landowner on Eastern Power Networks Plc that their Wayleave Agreement which crosses the Site,
will be terminated on 15th January 2026. This is the first step towards potentially securing the
ungrounding of the existing overhead power lines. However, at this stage it is not known whether
this is a realistically viable option. As such, as referred to above, two layout options, with and without
undergrounding, have been prepared and are being developed further.
3.43 It should also be noted that there is a mains sewer which follows the alignment of the existing Pylons
which means the two different schemes do not vary dramatically with a linear open space running
through the Site, even if the existing overhead power lines were to be undergrounded. This is not
to say there would not be visual and environmental benefits from fully exploring the opportunity for
undergrounding.
k) Development must discharge attenuated surface water to a receiving waterbody and not to the
combined sewer network, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no other option.
3.44 There is no objection to this criterion. A drainage strategy is being prepared as part of the scheme
development and, as referred to above, a technical note, Flood Risk and Drainage has already been
provided to the Council which confirms that surface water can be discharged to an appropriately
sized attenuation basin on site. A further copy of this technical note can be provided if required.
l) Demonstrate adequate capacity for managing wastewater including proposed phasing
requirements or alternative solutions to the satisfaction of the Council and Anglian Water;
3.45 As referred to above, a drainage strategy to inform the scheme development is being developed
and this will include engagement with Anglian Water.
3.46 Although as a statutory consultee, consultation would undoubtedly take place in connection with
this and other criteria, it is the local planning authority (not Anglian Water or any other body) that
makes the final decision on planning applications, accordingly it is inappropriate for Anglian to be
included in the Policy. References to the need for consultation and capacity issues if they exist can
be included in the support text.
3.47 It is relevant to note that Anglian Water have been raising issues up and down the country, objecting
to development due to insufficient capacity, and these objections are being further tested through
the courts. However, the law is clear that Anglian Water has a duty under the Water Industry Act
1991, to accept connections to the public sewer which they accept; the current issue is where there
is a shortage of headroom in the receiving waste water recycling centre (WRC), the speed at which
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
16 | P a g e
appropriate capacity can be delivered. Clearly, through a plan led system, there should not be a
problem for the sewage undertaker to align its asset management upgrade programme, a five year
cycle, with the housing trajectory proposed through a Local Plan and early engagement by site
promoters as well as the local planning authority will assist with this. This is clearly a matter which
should also be addressed through the infrastructure delivery plan and in turn needs to be linked to
the Council’s housing trajectory.
3.48 In conclusion the reference to Anglian Water in criterion l) should be deleted.
m) A range of measures in addition to prioritising SuDs (Policy EN8) and water efficiency measures
to reduce the risk on impact on the WRC capacity as a result of planned growth including:
i. Removal of unrequired network flows;
ii. Targeted education to include new residents of the development;
iii. Reduction in the demand for potable water.
3.49 It is unclear why this particular criterion has been included given the requirements for a site specific
flood risk assessment and drainage strategy, which would need to be in accordance with Policy EN8
and cover the items listed as i) to iii) above. In addition, as referred to in the comments above in
respect of criterion l) consultation with Anglian Water will be required and the above issues will be
addressed through this mechanism. It will also be linked to the infrastructure delivery plan and
housing trajectory.
3.50 It is considered that it would be more appropriate for this matter to be referred to in the supporting
text rather than as an additional policy element.
3.51 Criterion m) should be deleted.
n) Any site specific infrastructure requirements from the IDP (likely to include education provision,
highway mitigation, water and wastewater and specific community / open space provision).
3.52 There is no objection to this particular criterion, however, any site specific infrastructure
requirements will need to meet the statutory requirements as set out in Regulation 122 of the CIL
Regulations 2010 (as amended) i.e. be:
(a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms;
(b) directly related to the development; and
(c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development .
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
17 | P a g e
3.53 This will be particularly important bearing in mind that the Council is already a CIL charging authority
and there should be no double counting when considering infrastructure and mitigation.
3.54 In the national policy context of producing succinct local plans, as a general good practice comment
including this requirement does seem to be an unnecessary “belt and braces” approach, given the
reference to Policy ST7 in the introduction to the Policy, as well as the requirements set out in the
other criteria discussed above.
3.55 In conclusion it is recommended that criterion n) is deleted.
o) Before granting planning consent, wintering bird surveys will be undertaken at the appropriate
time of year to identify any offsite functional habitat. In the unlikely event that significant numbers
are identified, development must firstly avoid impacts. Where this is not possible, development
must be phased to deliver habitat creation and management either on or off-site to mitigate any
significant impacts. Any such habitat must be provided and fully functional before any
development takes place which would affect significant numbers of SPA birds
3.56 There is no objection to this criterion given the environmental sensitivities of the surrounding
protected sites. As part of the scheme development, ecologically assessments have been carried
out including bird surveys which were undertaken during January, February, and March 2025. These
confirmed that any use of the site by waterfowl was negligible. These results are included in the
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal which has already been provided to the Council. This assessment is
further supported by the surveys previously undertaken in relation to the CALA and Care Home site
which are also still relatively recent, albeit now out of date, but again not identifying any particular
concerns.
3.57 These conclusions are also supported by the Emerging Allocations Biodiversity Assessment as
referred to in Section 5 below.
All development Proposals within Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan Area, will also be determined
against the policies in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan (Adopted May 2019) where they are up
to date and relevant.
3.58 There is no objection to the final paragraph of the Policy which acknowledges the existence of the
Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan, which will remain part of the development plan for the area. This
helpfully confirms that the weight attached to its policies for decision making purposes in the future
will need to be moderated having regard to its age, consistency with the Local Plan strategic policies,
and national planning policy at the time of the determination of any future planning application
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
18 | P a g e
PP24 Summary
3.59 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. While the above section includes some relatively detailed
commentary in respect of the particular criteria and wording of Policy PP24, these are not intended
to be a criticism, but a positive review to assist the Council with the drafting of the forthcoming
version of the Policy and supporting text to be included in the Regulation19 submission version of
the Plan, to help ensure that the Plan can be found sound on examination with limited modification.
3.60 A track change version of Policy PP24 has been provided at Appendix B capturing the recommended
amendments set out above. In conclusion this representation supports Policy PP24 subject to the
recommended refinements and minor amendment to the Site area as indicated at Appendix A,
ensuring flexibility, clarity, and deliverability of the Site in the early part of the Plan period.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
19 | P a g e
4. POLICY GN5, SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL AND EVIDENCE BASE
Policy GN5: Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace
4.1 It is noted that the emerging Plan, includes Policy GN5: Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace. This
policy requires that the Natural England standard of 8 hectares per 1000 head of population be
applied where it is necessary to provide alternative greenspace as the result of a Habitat Regulations
Assessment. It is proposed that the policy wording should be reviewed to allow flexibility in the
application of this ratio, as opposed to an arbitrary calculation, and consideration should be given to
only applying it strategic scale development for example, over 1,000 dwellings.
4.2 On the basis that we would anticipate that an HRA for this particular site (Policy PP24) would be likely
to identify an impact on locally sensitive sites, we would suggest that a further consideration should
be given as to how the Council anticipate this standard might be delivered, noting that the direct
application of this standard to the Site would require an additional area of 3.36 ha of Greenspace to
be provided.
4.3 Such a requirement in addition to the existing land take to meet open space standards, on site SUDs
and on site BNG, would result in a significant reduction in the current housing potential, making the
current policy proposal for 175 dwellings unrealistic. This standard may also have a serious impact
on the viability on this Site and other similar proposed allocations
4.4 Furthermore, sites in Colchester do of course make RAMs contributions to seek to manage
recreational disturbance pressures, so again, this is a factor that should be taken into account
alongside the Natural England ratio which may not consider local factors such as this and effectively
result in double counting in conflict with the CIL Regulations.
Sustainability Appraisal Report (February 2025)
4.5 Both the Site and the wider allocation (PP24) have been considered within the evidence base
documents to the emerging Local Plan, including the Sustainability Appraisal Report (February 2025)
(the SA) which assesses whether the emerging Local Plan will help achieve sustainable development
when compared with reasonable alternatives.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
20 | P a g e
4.6 The SA confirms that Wivenhoe is a sustainable settlement and has good infrastructure provision
and is one of the four largest towns beyond the City of Colchester. However, it also indicates that the
proportion of growth directed to Wivenhoe and West Mersea is lower than the other two larger
settlements of Marks Tey and Tiptree owing to the internationally important biodiversity
designations.
4.7 At Table 5.36, a summary of the SA findings in respect of Policy PP24 is provided and expanded upon
at Paragraphs 5.323 to 5.329. It is considered that this provides a fair assessment of the Policy based
on the existing evidence base. It is noted that the conclusion is that no recommendations are
proposed for any changes to the Policy. In respect of the assessment, some of the areas where
negligible effects have been recorded, for example in respect of the historic environment (SA
Objective 7), Biodiversity and Geodiversity (SA Objective 8) and Landscape (SA Objective 9) a higher
score may well be achieved following the completion of the Site specific technical assessments
currently being undertaken by the Promoters, which will provide further detail and clarification on
the potential positive mitigation which can be delivered.
4.8 In conclusion, it is considered that the SA provides a robust assessment of the proposed allocations
and polices in the emerging plan. It has considered a comprehensive range of reasonable
alternatives, identified suitable and relevant options, and as such, is supported.
Summary of Sites Evidence (October 2025)
4.9 As part of the evidence base for the emerging Local Plan, the Council have produced a Summary of
Sites Evidence (October 2025) which contains a summary of the sites assessed as part of developing
the new Local Plan for housing and employment. These sites were collated via a ‘Call for sites’
exercise or a desktop review, with sites then assessed using the Strategic Land Availability
Assessment (SLAA). The Summary report also confirms that in bringing forward site allocation
choices within the Preferred Options Local Plan, other evidence base documents were used to
inform the suitability of sites.
4.10 The Site is considered under the name ‘Land North of the Fire Station’ Wivenhoe (Site Ref: 10755)
along with the other site submissions for the settlement. As part of the assessment the submitted
Site has been extended to include the ‘Care Home Land’ to the south. This amendment is supported
by the Promoters, however as referred to above a further modest increase in the site area as
discussed above and identified on the red line plan at Appendix A would also be beneficial.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
21 | P a g e
4.11 While the assessment acknowledges that the proposed allocation encroaches into the coalescence
area designated in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan, it helpfully acknowledges that the
encroachment is less than other proposals. It would be useful if the assessment were to highlight
that the allocation does not extend any further north along Colchester Road into the coalescence
break area than the northern boundary of the existing settlement around Feedhams Close on the
west side of Colchester Road when this report is updated next. It will also be necessary for it to reflect
the revised red line plan included at Appendix A.
4.12 The assessment also helpfully acknowledges that:
“The site is adjacent to one of the neighbourhood plan allocations and development can
be planned to complement that development, including delivering some of the homes
allocated on part of the existing allocation set aside for a care home, which is no lon ger
needed owing to the proposal for a care home on an alternative site in Wivenhoe. Access
can be made to the allotments to be delivered as part of the existing allocation
(currently with outline consent).”
4.13 This clarification is supported and considered helpful.
Emerging Allocations Biodiversity Assessment
4.14 The emerging allocations biodiversity assessment has undertaken a review of the proposed
allocation which is set out on page 60 of the report. The harm scoring is noted as:
“Little/no harm – the site has limited natural habitat value”
4.15 This assessment is supported and the general commentary is considered to be a fair reflection of
the Sites biodiversity value and potential, having regard to the site-specific ecological, arboricultural,
and landscape technical work which has recently been completed by the Site Promoters.
Heritage Impact Assessment Sift (January 2025)
4.16 The Heritage Impact Assessment Sift Methodology (January 2025) was a desk-based assessment of
each site to identify any heritage assets with the potential to be affected by their allocation. Following
the sift, three levels of further heritage impact assessment are recommended depending on the
potential impact of the allocation of a site on the historic environment. These were categorised as:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
22 | P a g e
• No further assessment: (the allocation of the site has been assessed to have no effect on the
significance of any heritage assets);
• Proforma Heritage Impact Assessment; and
• Detailed Heritage Impact Assessment.
4.17 The Land North of the Fire Station was assessed to fall within the first category, no further
assessment required and this conclusion is supported given the limited proximity of the nearest
designated heritage assets.
4.18 It is acknowledged that the site assessment indicates that a heritage statement will be required to
inform the layout of the site and scale of development, given the listed buildings in Colchester Road.
It is also noted that the assessment indicates that a desk-based archaeological assessment will be
required, potentially supported by trial trenching.
Colchester Infrastructure Audit and Delivery Plan, October 2025 (IADP)
4.19 The IADP at Table 2-3 indicates the planned housing growth over the plan period, for Wivenhoe
years 1-5 there are 175 houses planned. The opportunity for the Site to come forward early in the
plan period is supported and its ability to contribute fully to the Council’s ability to demonstrate a
five year housing land supply at the point of adoption is welcomed. As referred to elsewhere in this
consultation response, the Promoters are actively working towards the submission of an outline
application later this year (2026) to ensure that this delivery timetable is not delayed.
4.20 The above further demonstrates the suitability, availability, and deliverability of the Site for
residential development.
4.21 Appendix A of the IADP at Project ID 159 Transport, under Active Travel identifies the Wivenhoe
Mobility Hub as Phase 2, delivery 2029-2033, at an unfunded cost of £506,880 and continues under
the Funding Sources
Funding not secured. Developer funding expected from S106 and/or S278. Potential grant funding
routes include BSIP and LuF Proposed Funding Split - 100% contribution from preferred
allocations - 0% contribution from reference case developments - 0% contribut ion from external
grants.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
23 | P a g e
4.22 Clearly this a project which will not only benefit the future occupants of the Policy PP24 allocation,
but also the existing residents of Wivenhoe and the wider area. From the table it is unclear which
allocations are expected to contribute to this particular infrastructure upgrade. Having regard to the
CIL Tests what the reasonable and propionate financial contribution would be expected from the
development allocations, it is assumed that the reference to ‘0% contribution from reference case
developments ’ means this will be pooled contribution and a modest contribution is that would be
expected as a from development of the Site (Policy PP24).

Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
24 | P a g e
5. CONCLUSION
5.1 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. They welcome the opportunity to work with Planning Officers to
further refine the Policy and ensure that the Site is both a developable and deliverable housing
opportunity and can be delivered in in the early part of the plan period, helping the Council
demonstrate a five year housing land supply upon adoption.
5.2 Wivenhoe is a sustainable settlement and is one of the four largest towns beyond the City of
Colchester and an appropriate location to direct development in accordance with the Council’s
proposed development strategy which is supported along with the robust approach adopted by the
Sustainability Appraisal.
5.3 The draft Plan confirms that Wivenhoe benefits from a good range of infrastructure, including a
mainline train station, GP surgery, two primary schools, numerous shops and restaurants, and
abundant open space provision. It also benefits from public transport connections to Colchester
and a good cycle and footpath network which provide good connections to the University of Essex
amongst other destinations. As such, the Town can be acknowledged as a sustainable location, in
line with the Plans development strategy for the accommodation of further growth. This is
welcomed.
5.4 It is the Promoter’s intention to work up a formal pre-application submission to help further develop
the details of the Site proposals ahead of the potential submission of an outline application later in
the year, which will help to confirm that the Site is developable and provide a clearer indication of
when housing delivery will be likely to commence.
5.5 The Promoters consider that this represents an exciting opportunity for them to deliver a high
quality housing scheme which responds to the established environmental character of the
settlement edge and provides a range of modern homes in a beautiful, green, and sustainable
location, to meet the needs of the growing local community. Delivering a development which will
foster a strong sense of community and promote healthy and sustainable life styles, with a lasting
legacy and sense of pride, is a key objective.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
25 | P a g e
5.6 While this represent includes some relatively detailed commentary in respect of the particular
criteria and wording of Policy PP24, these are not intended to be a criticism, but a positive review to
assist the Council with the drafting of the forthcoming version of the Policy and supporting text to
be included in the Regulation19 submission version of the Plan, to help ensure that the Plan can be
found sound on examination with limited modification.
5.7 In summary, the Promoters support the Plan and Sustainability Appraisal along with the Council’s
assessment that the Site is suitable, available, and achievable within the plan period. Its early delivery
will also strengthen the Plan’s housing trajectory and the future five year housing land supply. This
representation supports Policy PP24 subject to the recommended refinements to the wording
recommended in Section 3 above and captured in track changes version of the Policy included at
Appendix B, as well minor amendment to the Site area (increased to 8.828 hectares) as indicated in
the Plan at Appendix A.
5.8 Inclusion of these amendments will help to ensure flexibility, clarity, and this representation aims to
confirm the deliverability of the Site in the early part of the Plan period.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
26 | P a g e
Appendix A - Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4
Proposed Amended Site Area


Revised Site Area Approximately 8.828 hectares

Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
27 | P a g e
Appendix B – Recommended Amendments to Policy
PP24
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
In addition to the infrastructure and mitigation requirements identified in Policy ST 7 and subject to
compliance with all other relevant policies, development will be supported on land within the area
identified on the policies map which provides:
a. Approximately 200 new dwellings of a mix and type of housing to meet evidenced needs and be
compatible with surrounding development;
b. Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point(s) of vehicle access
to be via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority
and demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety;
c. Provide a safe pedestrian and active travel access to ensure connectivity within and throughout
the site and to the settlement and surrounding area. Connections to existing footways and the
track to the allotments and where possible recreational access to the countryside should also be
considered. to existing footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green
infrastructure connections and recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel
links and connections to the settlement;
d. Contributions towards enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields;
e. Screening comprising locally appropriate tree belts and/or hedgerows will be required along the
site boundaries to ensure that development is sensitively integrated into the landscape and to
maintain settlement separation;
f. Biodiversity enhancement measures should include enhancing hedgerow condition and
establishing grassland habitats along road verges;
g. Development must conserve, and where appropriate, enhance the significance of heritage assets
(including any contribution made by their settings). Designated heritage assets close to the
allocated site includes five Grade II Listed Buildings as informed by the stage 1 HIA;
h. The total number of dwellings will be spread between this site and the area currently set aside
for a care home as part of the neighbourhood plan allocation;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
28 | P a g e
i. A new community space must be included within the site and pedestrian access to the adjacent
allotments must be created;
j. Opportunities for undergrounding should be explored;
k. Development must discharge attenuated surface water to a receiving waterbody and not to the
combined sewer network, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no other option.
l. Demonstrate adequate capacity for managing wastewater including proposed phasing
requirements or alternative solutions to the satisfaction of the Council and Anglian Water;
m. A range of measures in addition to prioritising SuDs (Policy EN8) and water efficiency measures
to reduce the risk on impact on the WRC capacity as a result of planned growth including:
i. Removal of unrequired network flows;
ii. Targeted education to include new residents of the development;
iii. Reduction in the demand for potable water.
n. Any site specific infrastructure requirements from the IDP (likely to include education provision,
highway mitigation, water and wastewater and specific community / open space provision).
o. Before granting planning consent, wintering bird surveys will be undertaken at the appropriate
time of year to identify any offsite functional habitat. In the unlikely event that significant numbers
are identified, development must firstly avoid impacts. Where this is not possible, development
must be phased to deliver habitat creation and management either on or off-site to mitigate any
significant impacts. Any such habitat must be provided and fully functional before any
development takes place which would affect significant numbers of SPA birds.
All development Proposals within Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan Area, will also be determined against
the policies in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan (Adopted May 2019) where they are up to date and
relevant.

Colchester Local Plan
Regulation 18
Land Northwest of the Fire Station,
Wivenhoe
On behalf of
Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch
January 2026
CONSULTATION
RESPONSE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................................1
2. THE SITE.......................................................................................................................................................................5
3. POLICY PP24...............................................................................................................................................................7
4. POLICY GN5, SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL AND EVIDENCE BASE.................................................................19
5. CONCLUSION ...........................................................................................................................................................24
Appendix A - Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4............................................................................................26
Appendix B – Recommended Amendments to Policy PP24...................................................................................27
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
1 | P a g e
1. INTRODUCTION
Background
1.1 This representation is prepared on behalf of Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch (the
Promoters) in respect of the Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18
Consultation.
1.2 In January 2024 Ceres Property were instructed to make ‘Call for Sites’ submissions in respect of
three land parcels on the northern side of Wivenhoe (Site IDs: 10755, 10757 & 10756). The
submissions were accompanied by a Constraints and Opportunities Plan which was submitted in
support of potential development sites, and is reproduced at Figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Constraints and Opportunities Plan
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
2 | P a g e
1.3 For Wivenhoe, Policy PP24 proposes to allocate Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Colchester Road,
Wivenhoe for approximately 175 homes. This is predominantly the southern land parcel shown on
Figure 1 above, and subject to some revisions and commentary as set out below, is the focus of this
representation.
1.4 This representation provides formal comments on the draft policies within the plan considered
relevant to our client’s interests, in particular Policy PP24.
1.5 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
principle of the inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. They welcome the opportunity to work with
Planning Officers to further refine the Policy and ensure that the site is both a developable and
deliverable housing opportunity.
1.6 While they are obviously disappointed the other two land parcels have not been proposed as
allocations, we would like to confirm that they are both still available, either in their entirety or in
part for inclusion in the emerging plan, in the event further sites are required to meet the Council’s
substantial housing needs and ensure there is a sufficient supply of sites to do this over the plan
period.
Policy Context
1.7 In preparing these representations, regard has been had to the National Planning Policy Framework,
December 2024 (NPPF). Paragraph 11 of the NPPF sets out:
Plans and decisions should apply a presumption in favour of sustainable development.
For plan-making this means that:
a) all plans should promote a sustainable pattern of development that seeks to: meet
the development needs of their area; align growth and infrastructure; improve the
environment; mitigate climate change (including by making effective use of land in urban
areas) and adapt to its effects;
b) strategic policies should, as a minimum, provide for objectively assessed needs for
housing and other uses, as well as any needs that cannot be met within neighbouring
areas, unless:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
3 | P a g e
i. the application of policies in this Framework that protect areas or assets of particular
importance provides a strong reason for restricting the overall scale, type, or distribution
of development in the plan area; or
ii. any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the
benefits, when assessed against the policies in this Framework taken as a whole.…
1.8 Section 3 of the NPPF relates to ‘plan-making’. Paragraph 15 of the NPPF promotes a plan-led
system, and that succinct and up-to-date plans should provide a positive vision for the future of
each area; a framework for addressing housing needs and other economic, social and
environmental policies; and a platform for local people to shape their surroundings.
1.9 Paragraph 16 states that Plans should:
a) be prepared with the objective of contributing to the achievement of sustainable
development;
b) be prepared positively, in a way that is aspirational but deliverable;
c) be shaped by early, proportionate and effective engagement between plan -
makers and communities, local organisations, businesses, infrastructure
providers and operators and statutory consultees;
d) contain policies that are clearly written and unambiguous, so it is evident how a
decision maker should react to development proposals;
e) be accessible through the use of digital tools to assist public involvement and
policy presentation; and
f) serve a clear purpose, avoiding unnecessary duplication of policies that apply to
a particular area (including policies in this Framework, where relevant).
1.10 As set out at paragraph 36, local plans are examined to assess whether they have been prepared in
accordance with legal and procedural requirements, to determine whether they can be considered
‘sound’. The test for soundness as set out within the NPPF requires that Plans are:
a) Positively prepared
b) Justified
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
4 | P a g e
c) Effective
d) Consistent with national policy
1.11 By way of background to the Council’s preparation of the emerging Local Plan, it is acknowledged
that the Council’s current five year land supply is increasingly marginal.
1.12 In February 2026 the existing Adopted Section 1 Local Plan becomes five years old, and the housing
requirement within it will accordingly be out of date for the purposes of calculation of five year
housing land supply as set by NPPF paragraph 232. At this point in time the Council accept that they
will be unable to demonstrate a five year housing land supply and this situation is unlikely to be
rectified until the adoption of the new Local Plan.
1.13 The housing land supply annual requirement will therefore become approximately 1,300 dwellings
per annum in line with the standard method, as opposed to 920 dpa within the existing adopted
Local Plan. Over a five year period this will add 1,900 homes to the required supply, plus the required
buffer.
1.14 The Council acknowledges this requirement at paragraph 3.36 of the Regulation 18 Consultation
document, confirming that the requirement for 20,800 new homes over the plan period is a
mandatory target (or minimum target [emphasis added] ) which must be planned for. At present
the draft Plan proposes to deliver 21,106 new homes which equates to a headroom of just 1.1%.
There is also a significant Affordable Housing need in the Borough, which the 2024 Housing Needs
Assessment indicates equates to 877 affordable dpa. Both these factors suggest that it is likely that
the Regulation 19 Plan will need to establish a higher total requirement figure, not only to provide
an appropriate buffer of a minimum 5% but also to boost overall numbers to help address acute
affordable housing needs.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
5 | P a g e
2. THE SITE
2.1 On 7th February 2025 the Council published papers for the Local Plan Committee meeting to be
held on 17th February which included a full draft of the Regulation 18 Preferred Options Local Plan
and the inclusion of Policy PP24. While at that time the resolution to publish the plan for consultation
was not agreed, the draft Plan sought to allocate sufficient sites to provide for 1,300 dwellings per
year across the new Plan period to 2041. For Wivenhoe, Policy PP24 proposed to allocate Land
Northwest of the Fire Station for approximately 175 homes.
2.2 As stated above, Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcomed the proposed inclusion of the
Land Northwest of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Local Plan. Having reviewed draft
Policy PP24, the Promoters have been working with their consultant team to progress further
technical work to help support the Site’s early delivery. Updated plans and technical notes/reports
have now been produced to provide further evidence to support the Site’s inclusion as both a
developable and deliverable opportunity. These confirm that, a development with the following
description could be brought forward;
A proposed residential development of approximately 200 dwellings with land for a new
community space, associated public open space, landscaping , and infrastructure.
2.3 A positive meeting with officers from the Council’s Planning Policy Team was held on 16th December
2025 to provide an update on the progress which has been made to date. The following documents
were provided to the Council ahead of the meeting:
• Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Wivenhoe Constraints and Opportunities Context Plan – COP-01 P4: Produced by Thrive
Architects
• Concept Master Plan Option 1 – CMP-02 P7: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Concept Master Plan Option 2 – CMP-02 P8: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Land Budget Plan Option 1 – LBP-02 P7: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Land Budget Plan Option 2 – LBP-02 P8: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Proposed Access – 1255-TA11: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
6 | P a g e
• Arboricultural Impact Plan – OE-002 October 2025: Produced by Origin Environmental
• Technical Note – Highways: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
• Indicative Attenuation Requirement – 1255-FRA03 Rev A: Produced by Martin Andrews
Consulting
• Technical Note – Flood Risk and Drainage: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
• Landscape & Visual Technical Note – October 2025: Produced by Aspect Landscape Planning
• Preliminary Ecological Appraisal – September 2025: Produced by Blackstone Ecology Ltd
2.4 Apart from the Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4 (at Appendix A) these have not been reprovided as part of the consultation response; however, further copies can be made available if
required.
2.5 Following the submission of this representation it is the Promoters intention to work up a formal
pre-application submission to help further develop the detail of site proposals ahead of the potential
submission of an outline application later in the year, which will help to confirm that the Site is
developable and provide a clearer indication of when housing delivery may actually commence.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
7 | P a g e
3. POLICY PP24
Supporting Text
3.1 The supporting text for Policy PP24 is set out at paragraph 12.24 of the draft Plan. This confirms that
Wivenhoe benefits from a good range of infrastructure including a mainline train station, GP surgery,
two primary schools, numerous shops and restaurants, and abundant open space provision. It also
benefits from public transport connections to Colchester and a good cycle and footpath network
which provides good connections to the University of Essex, amongst other destinations. As such,
the Town can be acknowledged as a sustainable location, in line with the Plans development strategy
for the accommodation of further growth.
3.2 Paragraph 12.24 also acknowledges there are a number of environmental constraints which
reasonably restrict the opportunities for the town’s expansion to the south, east, and west, which
confirms the only logical direction for some proportionate growth is to the north.
3.3 There is also a made neighbourhood plan for Wivenhoe, the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan
(Adopted May 2019), which has helped to guide development in the past, whilst safeguarding the
surrounding environmentally sensitive areas. Whilst this is part of the Development Plan, it is now
over five years old and as such the weight which can be attributed to its policies will need to be
moderated to reflect the increased local housing requirement.
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
3.4 The requirements of Policy PP24 are set out in turn below with comments and responses provided
to each of the relevant criteria. Overall, the allocation is supported with the proposal for
approximately 175 new homes, or more to make the most efficient use of the Site, considered
appropriate, given the sustainability of the settlement, and Wivenhoe’s position in the Borough’s
settlement hierarchy. There are, however, a number criteria within the Policy which it is considered
might be better worded, require clarification, or are not actually considered to be necessary to
enable the effective delivery of the allocation.


Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
8 | P a g e
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
In addition to the infrastructure and mitigation requirements identified in Policy ST 7 and subject to
compliance with all other relevant policies, development will be supported on land within the area
identified on the policies map which provides:
3.5 As referred to above the extent of the Site boundary (red line) has been reviewed as part of the
current scheme development; in particular having regard to the landscape, ecological and access
technical work which has been completed to date. Some revisions to the Site boundary are now
proposed and these are included on the accompanying Site Plan SLP-01 P4 which is attached at
Appendix A. The extent of the Site and development boundary shown on the draft policies map we
consider should be updated to reflect the full extent of the amended site area, which is 8.828
hectares.
3.6 The amendments can be summarised as follows:
• The northern boundary: Has been adjusted to the north along Colchester Road to deliver a
better development relationship with Feedhams Close on the west side of Colchester Road
and provide a more logical settlement boundary along the northern part of the town while
allowing the slightly enlarged site to deliver an appropriate and efficient quantum of
development, reflecting the sustainability of Wivenhoe as a location. This also helps to better
accommodate the required access visibility splay to the north and provide a stronger gateway
into the settlement. Along the northern boundary from an ecological and biodiversity point of
view, it is also important to include a 5m buffer on the north side of existing hedgerow, ditch,
and tree cover, for enhancement and management purposes, however this area will not
include any built development.
• Southern boundary: This includes the track to allotments and the former care home site.
• Eastern boundary: This follows the title plan.
• Western boundary: This follows the edge of the new of allotment site.
3.7 While these changes will marginally increase the size of the site, they help to facilitate it delivering at
least the anticipated quantum of development, without compromising the ability to retain and
improve the existing important landscape trees, hedges, and ditches, and also ensure that the
biodiversity value of these features can be maximised in the long term.
a) Approximately 175 new dwellings of a mix and type of housing to meet evidenced needs and be
compatible with surrounding development;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
9 | P a g e
3.8 Criteria a) is supported, however there does need to be some flexibility in respect of the total
number of dwellings which can be delivered. Currently two different development options are being
developed, one which reflects the pylons which cross the site as being retained, and a second which
reflects Policy criterion j) showing them undergrounded. At present these options confirm that 175
dwellings are likely to be below the minimum number of dwellings the Site can deliver and in reality,
higher numbers will be achievable in order to make the most efficient use of the land available in
this sustainable location.
3.9 Both Concept Master Plan options seek to retain existing landscape features, primarily the existing
field boundaries. A single point of access is provided to Colchester Road with a main spine road
running through the Site and providing an all modes connection to the north-west corner of the
Cala Homes development.
3.10 To provide a vehicle connection between the eastern half of the Site and the west, it will be necessary
to remove a short central section of the existing hedgerow. This will be kept to a minimum and
compensatory planting will be carried out. Additional pedestrian connectivity has also been
provided to assist the integration of the Care Home land, the Cala development, the new allotments,
and the wider Site.
3.11 Generous areas of landscaping and green space have been included, with green buffers to existing
landscape features throughout. The landscaping will help to establish an appropriate rural character
to the scheme and some separation between the internal development parcels, reflective of the
Site’s edge of settlement location.
3.12 On the western side of the Site a surface water attenuation basin is proposed which can be gravity
fed from the remainder of the development area. This will also be located close to the existing
attenuation basin which serves the Cala development, and the new allotment site to the west,
creating a large natural space, rich in habitat value and adding a tranquil area to the setting of the
new allotments.
3.13 The Promoters architects are currently refining the site option plans to ensure that an efficient use
of the site can be delivered at an appropriate density to reflect the landscape sensitivity of the site,
however, the early indications are that a higher number of dwellings is likely to be deliverable and
as such it is recommended that the figure of approximately 175 dwellings is slightly increased to
approximately 200 dwellings. When the additional design work has been completed, we will provide
the Council with an update of the most realistic site capacity, to help inform the next stage of the
emerging Plan.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
10 | P a g e
b) Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point of vehicle access to
be via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority and
demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety;
3.14 It is noted that criteria (b) of Policy PP24 seems to suggest that the; ‘…point of vehicle access to be via
the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation…’ The existing access to the Cala development is
physically constrained by the existing buildings in Watsham Place and as such it is not considered
that it would be desirable in highway terms for it to serve approximately 260 dwellings.
3.15 As part of the scheme development process, it has therefore been concluded that providing a new
point of access further north along Colchester Road would deliver substantial highway safety and
amenity benefits, reducing the potential for congestion around the junctions of Vine Drive and
Elmstead Road. Additional pedestrian and cycle connections can be provided directly to Colchester
Road, as part of this new access, as well as to the new track to the allotments, in the south-east
corner of the Site frontage as well. A vehicle link to the Cala development is also proposed which
ultimately will create a loop through both sites. This will improve the over permeability of both sites.
3.16 In respect of the location of the new Site access on Colchester Road, a central location is considered
to be the only feasible option to serve the development. This is because there is not scope to locate
the access to the south due to the separation distance required from the Elmstead Road junction
and the controlled crossing, meaning there are no suitable non constrained alternative locations. A
Highway Technical Note and accompanying plans have already been provided to the Planning Policy
Team and further copies can be made available upon request. As the scheme development is
progressed engagement with Essex County Council Highways will be undertaken to help confirm
the technical acceptability of these arrangements.
3.17 It is therefore recommended that criterion b) should be amended to the following:
Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point (s) of vehicle access to be
via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority and
demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety .
3.18 The Promoters would be happy to discuss this or another form of suitable access with the Council.
c) Provide a safe pedestrian access to ensure connectivity within and throughout the site to existing
footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green infrastructure connections and
recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel links and connections to the
settlement;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
11 | P a g e
3.19 This criterion appears to be trying to address three matters, which are generally related, however,
the reference to green infrastructure connections is considered confusing as these connections are
not only associated with accessibility but also green and blue corridors where it may be more
appropriate to discourage public activity from an ecological perspective. Furthermore, there are no
public rights of way crossing, or immediately adjoining the site. It is therefore recommended that
criteria c) is amended as follows:
c) Provide a safe pedestrian and active travel access to ensure connectivity within and throughout the
site and to the settlement and surrounding area . Connections to existing footways and the track to
the allotments and where possible recreational access to the countryside should also be considered .
to existing footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green infrastructure
connections and recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel links and
connections to the settlement;
3.20 The delivery of green infrastructure connections can be secured through the statutory requirements
to deliver biodiversity net gain and the general layout of the development.
3.21 If the reference to green infrastructure connections was intended to suggest that public access
should not only be provided through the urban parts of the development, but also through more
informal rural settings, then this can be explained as part of the supporting text.
d) Contributions towards enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields;
3.22 There is no objection to this particular criterion. While the emerging scheme which is being
developed for the Site will provide the minimum 10% open space requirement currently operated
by the Council, given the size of the development it is unlikely that this will include any formal sports
facilities, and as such it is appropriate that some mitigation should be delivered providing this is not
already captured as part of the Council’s CIL charging schedule.
e) Screening comprising locally appropriate tree belts and/or hedgerows will be required along the
site boundaries to ensure that development is sensitively integrated into the landscape and to
maintain settlement separation;
3.23 This is a reasonable requirement, and the current scheme development is being informed by an
accompanying landscape strategy which seeks to retain existing hedgerows and tree belts with
appropriate buffers and introduce new tree belts and/or hedgerows where necessary along the Site
boundaries to ensure the Site is sensitively integrated into the townscape.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
12 | P a g e
f) Biodiversity enhancement measures should include enhancing hedgerow condition and
establishing grassland habitats along road verges;
3.24 There is no particular objection to this policy criteria, however, given the statutory biodiversity
enhancement requirements which will be secured through the detailed planning application stage
and a statutory biodiversity net gain condition, it is unclear why there is a site specific requirement
for establishing grassland habitats along road verges in this particular location. As such these
comments might be better included in the supporting text of policy where further explanation and
justification can be provided.
3.25 It is therefore considered that unless there is site specific justification available this criterion should
be deleted.
g) Development must conserve, and where appropriate, enhance the significance of heritage assets
(including any contribution made by their settings). Designated heritage assets close to the
allocated site includes five Grade II Listed Buildings as informed by the stage 1 HIA;
3.26 This is in line with national policy and legislative requirements which require heritage assets to be
conserved or enhanced, not conserved and enhanced. It is considered that the Site can be
developed to ensure that the setting of the nearby listed buildings are, as a minimum, preserved.
3.27 It is noted that the Heritage Impact Assessment Sift Methodology (January 2025) classified the site
as not requiring any further investigation at this stage but indicates that a proportionate heritage
impact assessment, desk-based archaeological assessment and potentially trial trenching, should
be part of the planning application stage.
h) The total number of dwellings will be spread between this site and the area currently set aside
for a care home as part of the neighbourhood plan allocation;
This criterion is supported as it will provide clarity in respect of the status of the Neighbourhood
Plan as part of the development plan and the Site’s existing designation for use as a care home.
3.28 Following the original outline permission (Ref: 213507) in January 2024 for the adjoining housing
site, which included permission for a 60 bed care home, the site was marketed and Cala Homes
purchased the residential element, however, very little interest was expressed in the Care Home
site. More recently, in October 2024, a focused marketing exercise commenced for the care home
land. Over twenty operators were contacted directly, however, despite the extensive marketing, only
one operator expressed any serious interest, and after a more detailed review concluded the site
was not suitable for their requirements.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
13 | P a g e
3.29 It is also relevant that the care home land to the rear of the Fire Station was not the only opportunity
for care home provision to be made by the Neighbourhood Plan. At paragraph 16.35, the
Neighbourhood Plan notes this and states: “Whether proposals for care homes come forward will
depend on market factors.” Furthermore, the Council have recently resolved to grant planning
permission (Ref: 240409) at the Croquet Gardens site for 25 Bungalows and a 60-Bed Care Home.
Therefore, the care home land to the rear of the Fire Station is not required or suitable for care
home use to meet any current local need and, as such, there is sufficient justification for its logical
inclusion as part of the residential allocation.
3.30 This is also recognised in the Summary of Sites Evidence (October 2025) evidence base document
as set out in Section 4 below.
i) A new community space must be included within the site and pedestrian access to the adjacent
allotments must be created;
3.31 The Site Promoters would be agreeable to including a community space/land as part of the scheme
development, however, there needs to be a clear vision around what is actually necessary,
proportionate, and justified.
3.32 At the present time, this criterion is considered to be imprecise in respect of the size and type of
community space which is required and is lacking justification.
3.33 While pedestrian access will clearly be provided to the adjacent allotments through the inclusion of
the allotment access track, this can also be secured under criterion c) above.
3.34 Having regard to the limited information in the Infrastructure Audit and Delivery Plan (October 2025)
(IADP), which it is acknowledged does refer to a limited range of community facilities at Table 3.25
(Page 69). However, it does not expand this any further and explain which community facilities there
are a shortage of. It is noted that those facilities listed in the introduction to section seem to relate
to buildings such as community halls and libraries rather than ‘spaces’.
3.35 While the Sustainability Appraisal refers to this as a potential community benefit for residents in the
north of the settlement, it fails to provide any further guidance what is expected.
3.36 The reference in the IADP does not seem to align with the assessment set out in the Settlement
Evidence Stage 1 Document (November 2024). This evidence document includes an analysis of
Wivenhoe (Page 108 onwards) which generally confirms that it is a sustainable location with a good
range of community facilities and local services. This does not suggest a shortage of community
buildings. At Page 109 it states:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
14 | P a g e
“There is numerous community and social infrastructure in Wivenhoe. There is a GP
surgery, dentist surgeries, shops including a One Stop, Co -op and numerous
independent shops. There is a library , three hair salons and three barbers, art galleries.
There are nine public houses/restaurants, four cafes, a fish and chip shop, football
ground, tennis courts, cricket ground, bowls club, allotments and open space provision
including playing fields. Ther e are multiple churches and community halls .” [emphasis
added]
3.37 Under the section on High Level Opportunities (at a settlement level), whilst it suggests that growth
may provide opportunities to enhance local infrastructure, including active travel within the
settlement and beyond, there is no mention of a need for additional community spaces or buildings.
There is, however, reference to the Wivenhoe Green Spaces Community Project which
demonstrates how a mosaic of sites of varying sizes contribute to the green infrastructure of the
town and encourage diversity of wild flowers on green spaces, bringing significant ecological, climate,
and heritage benefits.
3.38 As referred to above, noting that the Council is a CIL charging authority and 25% of CIL receipts will
be transferred directly to Wivenhoe Parish Council to spend on local projects, there does not appear
to be any reasonable justification for this criterion at present.
3.39 Furthermore, criterion d) indicates there is a particular need for contributions towards the
enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields which it is assumed would be
secured separately to CIL, through a Section 106 Agreement. Requiring the Site to deliver a further
additional community space or land as well as a contribution to this existing community recreation
space is not considered reasonable or proportionate to the scale of the proposed development. As
such it is not likely to be compliant with the tests set out in the CIL Regulations without further
appropriate site-specific justification.
3.40 In respect of the current scheme development work, without more precise understanding of what
a community space may be required to deliver it is difficult to understand where it might be best
located on the site, the type and extent of land required, the potential neighbouring impact it may
have and what accessibility requirements may be necessary. It would therefore be extremely helpful
to have further clarification on this matter if the criterion is to be retained.
3.41 In summary, at the present time it is therefore considered that criterion i) should be deleted or
further site specific justification should be provided.
j) Opportunities for undergrounding should be explored
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
15 | P a g e
3.42 There is no objection to this criterion. At the beginning of July 2025 notice was served by the
landowner on Eastern Power Networks Plc that their Wayleave Agreement which crosses the Site,
will be terminated on 15th January 2026. This is the first step towards potentially securing the
ungrounding of the existing overhead power lines. However, at this stage it is not known whether
this is a realistically viable option. As such, as referred to above, two layout options, with and without
undergrounding, have been prepared and are being developed further.
3.43 It should also be noted that there is a mains sewer which follows the alignment of the existing Pylons
which means the two different schemes do not vary dramatically with a linear open space running
through the Site, even if the existing overhead power lines were to be undergrounded. This is not
to say there would not be visual and environmental benefits from fully exploring the opportunity for
undergrounding.
k) Development must discharge attenuated surface water to a receiving waterbody and not to the
combined sewer network, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no other option.
3.44 There is no objection to this criterion. A drainage strategy is being prepared as part of the scheme
development and, as referred to above, a technical note, Flood Risk and Drainage has already been
provided to the Council which confirms that surface water can be discharged to an appropriately
sized attenuation basin on site. A further copy of this technical note can be provided if required.
l) Demonstrate adequate capacity for managing wastewater including proposed phasing
requirements or alternative solutions to the satisfaction of the Council and Anglian Water;
3.45 As referred to above, a drainage strategy to inform the scheme development is being developed
and this will include engagement with Anglian Water.
3.46 Although as a statutory consultee, consultation would undoubtedly take place in connection with
this and other criteria, it is the local planning authority (not Anglian Water or any other body) that
makes the final decision on planning applications, accordingly it is inappropriate for Anglian to be
included in the Policy. References to the need for consultation and capacity issues if they exist can
be included in the support text.
3.47 It is relevant to note that Anglian Water have been raising issues up and down the country, objecting
to development due to insufficient capacity, and these objections are being further tested through
the courts. However, the law is clear that Anglian Water has a duty under the Water Industry Act
1991, to accept connections to the public sewer which they accept; the current issue is where there
is a shortage of headroom in the receiving waste water recycling centre (WRC), the speed at which
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
16 | P a g e
appropriate capacity can be delivered. Clearly, through a plan led system, there should not be a
problem for the sewage undertaker to align its asset management upgrade programme, a five year
cycle, with the housing trajectory proposed through a Local Plan and early engagement by site
promoters as well as the local planning authority will assist with this. This is clearly a matter which
should also be addressed through the infrastructure delivery plan and in turn needs to be linked to
the Council’s housing trajectory.
3.48 In conclusion the reference to Anglian Water in criterion l) should be deleted.
m) A range of measures in addition to prioritising SuDs (Policy EN8) and water efficiency measures
to reduce the risk on impact on the WRC capacity as a result of planned growth including:
i. Removal of unrequired network flows;
ii. Targeted education to include new residents of the development;
iii. Reduction in the demand for potable water.
3.49 It is unclear why this particular criterion has been included given the requirements for a site specific
flood risk assessment and drainage strategy, which would need to be in accordance with Policy EN8
and cover the items listed as i) to iii) above. In addition, as referred to in the comments above in
respect of criterion l) consultation with Anglian Water will be required and the above issues will be
addressed through this mechanism. It will also be linked to the infrastructure delivery plan and
housing trajectory.
3.50 It is considered that it would be more appropriate for this matter to be referred to in the supporting
text rather than as an additional policy element.
3.51 Criterion m) should be deleted.
n) Any site specific infrastructure requirements from the IDP (likely to include education provision,
highway mitigation, water and wastewater and specific community / open space provision).
3.52 There is no objection to this particular criterion, however, any site specific infrastructure
requirements will need to meet the statutory requirements as set out in Regulation 122 of the CIL
Regulations 2010 (as amended) i.e. be:
(a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms;
(b) directly related to the development; and
(c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development .
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
17 | P a g e
3.53 This will be particularly important bearing in mind that the Council is already a CIL charging authority
and there should be no double counting when considering infrastructure and mitigation.
3.54 In the national policy context of producing succinct local plans, as a general good practice comment
including this requirement does seem to be an unnecessary “belt and braces” approach, given the
reference to Policy ST7 in the introduction to the Policy, as well as the requirements set out in the
other criteria discussed above.
3.55 In conclusion it is recommended that criterion n) is deleted.
o) Before granting planning consent, wintering bird surveys will be undertaken at the appropriate
time of year to identify any offsite functional habitat. In the unlikely event that significant numbers
are identified, development must firstly avoid impacts. Where this is not possible, development
must be phased to deliver habitat creation and management either on or off-site to mitigate any
significant impacts. Any such habitat must be provided and fully functional before any
development takes place which would affect significant numbers of SPA birds
3.56 There is no objection to this criterion given the environmental sensitivities of the surrounding
protected sites. As part of the scheme development, ecologically assessments have been carried
out including bird surveys which were undertaken during January, February, and March 2025. These
confirmed that any use of the site by waterfowl was negligible. These results are included in the
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal which has already been provided to the Council. This assessment is
further supported by the surveys previously undertaken in relation to the CALA and Care Home site
which are also still relatively recent, albeit now out of date, but again not identifying any particular
concerns.
3.57 These conclusions are also supported by the Emerging Allocations Biodiversity Assessment as
referred to in Section 5 below.
All development Proposals within Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan Area, will also be determined
against the policies in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan (Adopted May 2019) where they are up
to date and relevant.
3.58 There is no objection to the final paragraph of the Policy which acknowledges the existence of the
Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan, which will remain part of the development plan for the area. This
helpfully confirms that the weight attached to its policies for decision making purposes in the future
will need to be moderated having regard to its age, consistency with the Local Plan strategic policies,
and national planning policy at the time of the determination of any future planning application
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
18 | P a g e
PP24 Summary
3.59 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. While the above section includes some relatively detailed
commentary in respect of the particular criteria and wording of Policy PP24, these are not intended
to be a criticism, but a positive review to assist the Council with the drafting of the forthcoming
version of the Policy and supporting text to be included in the Regulation19 submission version of
the Plan, to help ensure that the Plan can be found sound on examination with limited modification.
3.60 A track change version of Policy PP24 has been provided at Appendix B capturing the recommended
amendments set out above. In conclusion this representation supports Policy PP24 subject to the
recommended refinements and minor amendment to the Site area as indicated at Appendix A,
ensuring flexibility, clarity, and deliverability of the Site in the early part of the Plan period.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
19 | P a g e
4. POLICY GN5, SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL AND EVIDENCE BASE
Policy GN5: Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace
4.1 It is noted that the emerging Plan, includes Policy GN5: Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace. This
policy requires that the Natural England standard of 8 hectares per 1000 head of population be
applied where it is necessary to provide alternative greenspace as the result of a Habitat Regulations
Assessment. It is proposed that the policy wording should be reviewed to allow flexibility in the
application of this ratio, as opposed to an arbitrary calculation, and consideration should be given to
only applying it strategic scale development for example, over 1,000 dwellings.
4.2 On the basis that we would anticipate that an HRA for this particular site (Policy PP24) would be likely
to identify an impact on locally sensitive sites, we would suggest that a further consideration should
be given as to how the Council anticipate this standard might be delivered, noting that the direct
application of this standard to the Site would require an additional area of 3.36 ha of Greenspace to
be provided.
4.3 Such a requirement in addition to the existing land take to meet open space standards, on site SUDs
and on site BNG, would result in a significant reduction in the current housing potential, making the
current policy proposal for 175 dwellings unrealistic. This standard may also have a serious impact
on the viability on this Site and other similar proposed allocations
4.4 Furthermore, sites in Colchester do of course make RAMs contributions to seek to manage
recreational disturbance pressures, so again, this is a factor that should be taken into account
alongside the Natural England ratio which may not consider local factors such as this and effectively
result in double counting in conflict with the CIL Regulations.
Sustainability Appraisal Report (February 2025)
4.5 Both the Site and the wider allocation (PP24) have been considered within the evidence base
documents to the emerging Local Plan, including the Sustainability Appraisal Report (February 2025)
(the SA) which assesses whether the emerging Local Plan will help achieve sustainable development
when compared with reasonable alternatives.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
20 | P a g e
4.6 The SA confirms that Wivenhoe is a sustainable settlement and has good infrastructure provision
and is one of the four largest towns beyond the City of Colchester. However, it also indicates that the
proportion of growth directed to Wivenhoe and West Mersea is lower than the other two larger
settlements of Marks Tey and Tiptree owing to the internationally important biodiversity
designations.
4.7 At Table 5.36, a summary of the SA findings in respect of Policy PP24 is provided and expanded upon
at Paragraphs 5.323 to 5.329. It is considered that this provides a fair assessment of the Policy based
on the existing evidence base. It is noted that the conclusion is that no recommendations are
proposed for any changes to the Policy. In respect of the assessment, some of the areas where
negligible effects have been recorded, for example in respect of the historic environment (SA
Objective 7), Biodiversity and Geodiversity (SA Objective 8) and Landscape (SA Objective 9) a higher
score may well be achieved following the completion of the Site specific technical assessments
currently being undertaken by the Promoters, which will provide further detail and clarification on
the potential positive mitigation which can be delivered.
4.8 In conclusion, it is considered that the SA provides a robust assessment of the proposed allocations
and polices in the emerging plan. It has considered a comprehensive range of reasonable
alternatives, identified suitable and relevant options, and as such, is supported.
Summary of Sites Evidence (October 2025)
4.9 As part of the evidence base for the emerging Local Plan, the Council have produced a Summary of
Sites Evidence (October 2025) which contains a summary of the sites assessed as part of developing
the new Local Plan for housing and employment. These sites were collated via a ‘Call for sites’
exercise or a desktop review, with sites then assessed using the Strategic Land Availability
Assessment (SLAA). The Summary report also confirms that in bringing forward site allocation
choices within the Preferred Options Local Plan, other evidence base documents were used to
inform the suitability of sites.
4.10 The Site is considered under the name ‘Land North of the Fire Station’ Wivenhoe (Site Ref: 10755)
along with the other site submissions for the settlement. As part of the assessment the submitted
Site has been extended to include the ‘Care Home Land’ to the south. This amendment is supported
by the Promoters, however as referred to above a further modest increase in the site area as
discussed above and identified on the red line plan at Appendix A would also be beneficial.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
21 | P a g e
4.11 While the assessment acknowledges that the proposed allocation encroaches into the coalescence
area designated in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan, it helpfully acknowledges that the
encroachment is less than other proposals. It would be useful if the assessment were to highlight
that the allocation does not extend any further north along Colchester Road into the coalescence
break area than the northern boundary of the existing settlement around Feedhams Close on the
west side of Colchester Road when this report is updated next. It will also be necessary for it to reflect
the revised red line plan included at Appendix A.
4.12 The assessment also helpfully acknowledges that:
“The site is adjacent to one of the neighbourhood plan allocations and development can
be planned to complement that development, including delivering some of the homes
allocated on part of the existing allocation set aside for a care home, which is no lon ger
needed owing to the proposal for a care home on an alternative site in Wivenhoe. Access
can be made to the allotments to be delivered as part of the existing allocation
(currently with outline consent).”
4.13 This clarification is supported and considered helpful.
Emerging Allocations Biodiversity Assessment
4.14 The emerging allocations biodiversity assessment has undertaken a review of the proposed
allocation which is set out on page 60 of the report. The harm scoring is noted as:
“Little/no harm – the site has limited natural habitat value”
4.15 This assessment is supported and the general commentary is considered to be a fair reflection of
the Sites biodiversity value and potential, having regard to the site-specific ecological, arboricultural,
and landscape technical work which has recently been completed by the Site Promoters.
Heritage Impact Assessment Sift (January 2025)
4.16 The Heritage Impact Assessment Sift Methodology (January 2025) was a desk-based assessment of
each site to identify any heritage assets with the potential to be affected by their allocation. Following
the sift, three levels of further heritage impact assessment are recommended depending on the
potential impact of the allocation of a site on the historic environment. These were categorised as:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
22 | P a g e
• No further assessment: (the allocation of the site has been assessed to have no effect on the
significance of any heritage assets);
• Proforma Heritage Impact Assessment; and
• Detailed Heritage Impact Assessment.
4.17 The Land North of the Fire Station was assessed to fall within the first category, no further
assessment required and this conclusion is supported given the limited proximity of the nearest
designated heritage assets.
4.18 It is acknowledged that the site assessment indicates that a heritage statement will be required to
inform the layout of the site and scale of development, given the listed buildings in Colchester Road.
It is also noted that the assessment indicates that a desk-based archaeological assessment will be
required, potentially supported by trial trenching.
Colchester Infrastructure Audit and Delivery Plan, October 2025 (IADP)
4.19 The IADP at Table 2-3 indicates the planned housing growth over the plan period, for Wivenhoe
years 1-5 there are 175 houses planned. The opportunity for the Site to come forward early in the
plan period is supported and its ability to contribute fully to the Council’s ability to demonstrate a
five year housing land supply at the point of adoption is welcomed. As referred to elsewhere in this
consultation response, the Promoters are actively working towards the submission of an outline
application later this year (2026) to ensure that this delivery timetable is not delayed.
4.20 The above further demonstrates the suitability, availability, and deliverability of the Site for
residential development.
4.21 Appendix A of the IADP at Project ID 159 Transport, under Active Travel identifies the Wivenhoe
Mobility Hub as Phase 2, delivery 2029-2033, at an unfunded cost of £506,880 and continues under
the Funding Sources
Funding not secured. Developer funding expected from S106 and/or S278. Potential grant funding
routes include BSIP and LuF Proposed Funding Split - 100% contribution from preferred
allocations - 0% contribution from reference case developments - 0% contribut ion from external
grants.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
23 | P a g e
4.22 Clearly this a project which will not only benefit the future occupants of the Policy PP24 allocation,
but also the existing residents of Wivenhoe and the wider area. From the table it is unclear which
allocations are expected to contribute to this particular infrastructure upgrade. Having regard to the
CIL Tests what the reasonable and propionate financial contribution would be expected from the
development allocations, it is assumed that the reference to ‘0% contribution from reference case
developments ’ means this will be pooled contribution and a modest contribution is that would be
expected as a from development of the Site (Policy PP24).

Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
24 | P a g e
5. CONCLUSION
5.1 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. They welcome the opportunity to work with Planning Officers to
further refine the Policy and ensure that the Site is both a developable and deliverable housing
opportunity and can be delivered in in the early part of the plan period, helping the Council
demonstrate a five year housing land supply upon adoption.
5.2 Wivenhoe is a sustainable settlement and is one of the four largest towns beyond the City of
Colchester and an appropriate location to direct development in accordance with the Council’s
proposed development strategy which is supported along with the robust approach adopted by the
Sustainability Appraisal.
5.3 The draft Plan confirms that Wivenhoe benefits from a good range of infrastructure, including a
mainline train station, GP surgery, two primary schools, numerous shops and restaurants, and
abundant open space provision. It also benefits from public transport connections to Colchester
and a good cycle and footpath network which provide good connections to the University of Essex
amongst other destinations. As such, the Town can be acknowledged as a sustainable location, in
line with the Plans development strategy for the accommodation of further growth. This is
welcomed.
5.4 It is the Promoter’s intention to work up a formal pre-application submission to help further develop
the details of the Site proposals ahead of the potential submission of an outline application later in
the year, which will help to confirm that the Site is developable and provide a clearer indication of
when housing delivery will be likely to commence.
5.5 The Promoters consider that this represents an exciting opportunity for them to deliver a high
quality housing scheme which responds to the established environmental character of the
settlement edge and provides a range of modern homes in a beautiful, green, and sustainable
location, to meet the needs of the growing local community. Delivering a development which will
foster a strong sense of community and promote healthy and sustainable life styles, with a lasting
legacy and sense of pride, is a key objective.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
25 | P a g e
5.6 While this represent includes some relatively detailed commentary in respect of the particular
criteria and wording of Policy PP24, these are not intended to be a criticism, but a positive review to
assist the Council with the drafting of the forthcoming version of the Policy and supporting text to
be included in the Regulation19 submission version of the Plan, to help ensure that the Plan can be
found sound on examination with limited modification.
5.7 In summary, the Promoters support the Plan and Sustainability Appraisal along with the Council’s
assessment that the Site is suitable, available, and achievable within the plan period. Its early delivery
will also strengthen the Plan’s housing trajectory and the future five year housing land supply. This
representation supports Policy PP24 subject to the recommended refinements to the wording
recommended in Section 3 above and captured in track changes version of the Policy included at
Appendix B, as well minor amendment to the Site area (increased to 8.828 hectares) as indicated in
the Plan at Appendix A.
5.8 Inclusion of these amendments will help to ensure flexibility, clarity, and this representation aims to
confirm the deliverability of the Site in the early part of the Plan period.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
26 | P a g e
Appendix A - Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4
Proposed Amended Site Area


Revised Site Area Approximately 8.828 hectares

Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
27 | P a g e
Appendix B – Recommended Amendments to Policy
PP24
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
In addition to the infrastructure and mitigation requirements identified in Policy ST 7 and subject to
compliance with all other relevant policies, development will be supported on land within the area
identified on the policies map which provides:
a. Approximately 200 new dwellings of a mix and type of housing to meet evidenced needs and be
compatible with surrounding development;
b. Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point(s) of vehicle access
to be via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority
and demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety;
c. Provide a safe pedestrian and active travel access to ensure connectivity within and throughout
the site and to the settlement and surrounding area. Connections to existing footways and the
track to the allotments and where possible recreational access to the countryside should also be
considered. to existing footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green
infrastructure connections and recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel
links and connections to the settlement;
d. Contributions towards enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields;
e. Screening comprising locally appropriate tree belts and/or hedgerows will be required along the
site boundaries to ensure that development is sensitively integrated into the landscape and to
maintain settlement separation;
f. Biodiversity enhancement measures should include enhancing hedgerow condition and
establishing grassland habitats along road verges;
g. Development must conserve, and where appropriate, enhance the significance of heritage assets
(including any contribution made by their settings). Designated heritage assets close to the
allocated site includes five Grade II Listed Buildings as informed by the stage 1 HIA;
h. The total number of dwellings will be spread between this site and the area currently set aside
for a care home as part of the neighbourhood plan allocation;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
28 | P a g e
i. A new community space must be included within the site and pedestrian access to the adjacent
allotments must be created;
j. Opportunities for undergrounding should be explored;
k. Development must discharge attenuated surface water to a receiving waterbody and not to the
combined sewer network, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no other option.
l. Demonstrate adequate capacity for managing wastewater including proposed phasing
requirements or alternative solutions to the satisfaction of the Council and Anglian Water;
m. A range of measures in addition to prioritising SuDs (Policy EN8) and water efficiency measures
to reduce the risk on impact on the WRC capacity as a result of planned growth including:
i. Removal of unrequired network flows;
ii. Targeted education to include new residents of the development;
iii. Reduction in the demand for potable water.
n. Any site specific infrastructure requirements from the IDP (likely to include education provision,
highway mitigation, water and wastewater and specific community / open space provision).
o. Before granting planning consent, wintering bird surveys will be undertaken at the appropriate
time of year to identify any offsite functional habitat. In the unlikely event that significant numbers
are identified, development must firstly avoid impacts. Where this is not possible, development
must be phased to deliver habitat creation and management either on or off-site to mitigate any
significant impacts. Any such habitat must be provided and fully functional before any
development takes place which would affect significant numbers of SPA birds.
All development Proposals within Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan Area, will also be determined against
the policies in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan (Adopted May 2019) where they are up to date and
relevant.

Colchester Local Plan
Regulation 18
Land Northwest of the Fire Station,
Wivenhoe
On behalf of
Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch
January 2026
CONSULTATION
RESPONSE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................................1
2. THE SITE.......................................................................................................................................................................5
3. POLICY PP24...............................................................................................................................................................7
4. POLICY GN5, SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL AND EVIDENCE BASE.................................................................19
5. CONCLUSION ...........................................................................................................................................................24
Appendix A - Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4............................................................................................26
Appendix B – Recommended Amendments to Policy PP24...................................................................................27
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
1 | P a g e
1. INTRODUCTION
Background
1.1 This representation is prepared on behalf of Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch (the
Promoters) in respect of the Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18
Consultation.
1.2 In January 2024 Ceres Property were instructed to make ‘Call for Sites’ submissions in respect of
three land parcels on the northern side of Wivenhoe (Site IDs: 10755, 10757 & 10756). The
submissions were accompanied by a Constraints and Opportunities Plan which was submitted in
support of potential development sites, and is reproduced at Figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Constraints and Opportunities Plan
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
2 | P a g e
1.3 For Wivenhoe, Policy PP24 proposes to allocate Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Colchester Road,
Wivenhoe for approximately 175 homes. This is predominantly the southern land parcel shown on
Figure 1 above, and subject to some revisions and commentary as set out below, is the focus of this
representation.
1.4 This representation provides formal comments on the draft policies within the plan considered
relevant to our client’s interests, in particular Policy PP24.
1.5 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
principle of the inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. They welcome the opportunity to work with
Planning Officers to further refine the Policy and ensure that the site is both a developable and
deliverable housing opportunity.
1.6 While they are obviously disappointed the other two land parcels have not been proposed as
allocations, we would like to confirm that they are both still available, either in their entirety or in
part for inclusion in the emerging plan, in the event further sites are required to meet the Council’s
substantial housing needs and ensure there is a sufficient supply of sites to do this over the plan
period.
Policy Context
1.7 In preparing these representations, regard has been had to the National Planning Policy Framework,
December 2024 (NPPF). Paragraph 11 of the NPPF sets out:
Plans and decisions should apply a presumption in favour of sustainable development.
For plan-making this means that:
a) all plans should promote a sustainable pattern of development that seeks to: meet
the development needs of their area; align growth and infrastructure; improve the
environment; mitigate climate change (including by making effective use of land in urban
areas) and adapt to its effects;
b) strategic policies should, as a minimum, provide for objectively assessed needs for
housing and other uses, as well as any needs that cannot be met within neighbouring
areas, unless:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
3 | P a g e
i. the application of policies in this Framework that protect areas or assets of particular
importance provides a strong reason for restricting the overall scale, type, or distribution
of development in the plan area; or
ii. any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the
benefits, when assessed against the policies in this Framework taken as a whole.…
1.8 Section 3 of the NPPF relates to ‘plan-making’. Paragraph 15 of the NPPF promotes a plan-led
system, and that succinct and up-to-date plans should provide a positive vision for the future of
each area; a framework for addressing housing needs and other economic, social and
environmental policies; and a platform for local people to shape their surroundings.
1.9 Paragraph 16 states that Plans should:
a) be prepared with the objective of contributing to the achievement of sustainable
development;
b) be prepared positively, in a way that is aspirational but deliverable;
c) be shaped by early, proportionate and effective engagement between plan -
makers and communities, local organisations, businesses, infrastructure
providers and operators and statutory consultees;
d) contain policies that are clearly written and unambiguous, so it is evident how a
decision maker should react to development proposals;
e) be accessible through the use of digital tools to assist public involvement and
policy presentation; and
f) serve a clear purpose, avoiding unnecessary duplication of policies that apply to
a particular area (including policies in this Framework, where relevant).
1.10 As set out at paragraph 36, local plans are examined to assess whether they have been prepared in
accordance with legal and procedural requirements, to determine whether they can be considered
‘sound’. The test for soundness as set out within the NPPF requires that Plans are:
a) Positively prepared
b) Justified
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
4 | P a g e
c) Effective
d) Consistent with national policy
1.11 By way of background to the Council’s preparation of the emerging Local Plan, it is acknowledged
that the Council’s current five year land supply is increasingly marginal.
1.12 In February 2026 the existing Adopted Section 1 Local Plan becomes five years old, and the housing
requirement within it will accordingly be out of date for the purposes of calculation of five year
housing land supply as set by NPPF paragraph 232. At this point in time the Council accept that they
will be unable to demonstrate a five year housing land supply and this situation is unlikely to be
rectified until the adoption of the new Local Plan.
1.13 The housing land supply annual requirement will therefore become approximately 1,300 dwellings
per annum in line with the standard method, as opposed to 920 dpa within the existing adopted
Local Plan. Over a five year period this will add 1,900 homes to the required supply, plus the required
buffer.
1.14 The Council acknowledges this requirement at paragraph 3.36 of the Regulation 18 Consultation
document, confirming that the requirement for 20,800 new homes over the plan period is a
mandatory target (or minimum target [emphasis added] ) which must be planned for. At present
the draft Plan proposes to deliver 21,106 new homes which equates to a headroom of just 1.1%.
There is also a significant Affordable Housing need in the Borough, which the 2024 Housing Needs
Assessment indicates equates to 877 affordable dpa. Both these factors suggest that it is likely that
the Regulation 19 Plan will need to establish a higher total requirement figure, not only to provide
an appropriate buffer of a minimum 5% but also to boost overall numbers to help address acute
affordable housing needs.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
5 | P a g e
2. THE SITE
2.1 On 7th February 2025 the Council published papers for the Local Plan Committee meeting to be
held on 17th February which included a full draft of the Regulation 18 Preferred Options Local Plan
and the inclusion of Policy PP24. While at that time the resolution to publish the plan for consultation
was not agreed, the draft Plan sought to allocate sufficient sites to provide for 1,300 dwellings per
year across the new Plan period to 2041. For Wivenhoe, Policy PP24 proposed to allocate Land
Northwest of the Fire Station for approximately 175 homes.
2.2 As stated above, Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcomed the proposed inclusion of the
Land Northwest of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Local Plan. Having reviewed draft
Policy PP24, the Promoters have been working with their consultant team to progress further
technical work to help support the Site’s early delivery. Updated plans and technical notes/reports
have now been produced to provide further evidence to support the Site’s inclusion as both a
developable and deliverable opportunity. These confirm that, a development with the following
description could be brought forward;
A proposed residential development of approximately 200 dwellings with land for a new
community space, associated public open space, landscaping , and infrastructure.
2.3 A positive meeting with officers from the Council’s Planning Policy Team was held on 16th December
2025 to provide an update on the progress which has been made to date. The following documents
were provided to the Council ahead of the meeting:
• Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Wivenhoe Constraints and Opportunities Context Plan – COP-01 P4: Produced by Thrive
Architects
• Concept Master Plan Option 1 – CMP-02 P7: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Concept Master Plan Option 2 – CMP-02 P8: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Land Budget Plan Option 1 – LBP-02 P7: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Land Budget Plan Option 2 – LBP-02 P8: Produced by Thrive Architects
• Proposed Access – 1255-TA11: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
6 | P a g e
• Arboricultural Impact Plan – OE-002 October 2025: Produced by Origin Environmental
• Technical Note – Highways: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
• Indicative Attenuation Requirement – 1255-FRA03 Rev A: Produced by Martin Andrews
Consulting
• Technical Note – Flood Risk and Drainage: Produced by Martin Andrews Consulting
• Landscape & Visual Technical Note – October 2025: Produced by Aspect Landscape Planning
• Preliminary Ecological Appraisal – September 2025: Produced by Blackstone Ecology Ltd
2.4 Apart from the Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4 (at Appendix A) these have not been reprovided as part of the consultation response; however, further copies can be made available if
required.
2.5 Following the submission of this representation it is the Promoters intention to work up a formal
pre-application submission to help further develop the detail of site proposals ahead of the potential
submission of an outline application later in the year, which will help to confirm that the Site is
developable and provide a clearer indication of when housing delivery may actually commence.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
7 | P a g e
3. POLICY PP24
Supporting Text
3.1 The supporting text for Policy PP24 is set out at paragraph 12.24 of the draft Plan. This confirms that
Wivenhoe benefits from a good range of infrastructure including a mainline train station, GP surgery,
two primary schools, numerous shops and restaurants, and abundant open space provision. It also
benefits from public transport connections to Colchester and a good cycle and footpath network
which provides good connections to the University of Essex, amongst other destinations. As such,
the Town can be acknowledged as a sustainable location, in line with the Plans development strategy
for the accommodation of further growth.
3.2 Paragraph 12.24 also acknowledges there are a number of environmental constraints which
reasonably restrict the opportunities for the town’s expansion to the south, east, and west, which
confirms the only logical direction for some proportionate growth is to the north.
3.3 There is also a made neighbourhood plan for Wivenhoe, the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan
(Adopted May 2019), which has helped to guide development in the past, whilst safeguarding the
surrounding environmentally sensitive areas. Whilst this is part of the Development Plan, it is now
over five years old and as such the weight which can be attributed to its policies will need to be
moderated to reflect the increased local housing requirement.
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
3.4 The requirements of Policy PP24 are set out in turn below with comments and responses provided
to each of the relevant criteria. Overall, the allocation is supported with the proposal for
approximately 175 new homes, or more to make the most efficient use of the Site, considered
appropriate, given the sustainability of the settlement, and Wivenhoe’s position in the Borough’s
settlement hierarchy. There are, however, a number criteria within the Policy which it is considered
might be better worded, require clarification, or are not actually considered to be necessary to
enable the effective delivery of the allocation.


Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
8 | P a g e
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
In addition to the infrastructure and mitigation requirements identified in Policy ST 7 and subject to
compliance with all other relevant policies, development will be supported on land within the area
identified on the policies map which provides:
3.5 As referred to above the extent of the Site boundary (red line) has been reviewed as part of the
current scheme development; in particular having regard to the landscape, ecological and access
technical work which has been completed to date. Some revisions to the Site boundary are now
proposed and these are included on the accompanying Site Plan SLP-01 P4 which is attached at
Appendix A. The extent of the Site and development boundary shown on the draft policies map we
consider should be updated to reflect the full extent of the amended site area, which is 8.828
hectares.
3.6 The amendments can be summarised as follows:
• The northern boundary: Has been adjusted to the north along Colchester Road to deliver a
better development relationship with Feedhams Close on the west side of Colchester Road
and provide a more logical settlement boundary along the northern part of the town while
allowing the slightly enlarged site to deliver an appropriate and efficient quantum of
development, reflecting the sustainability of Wivenhoe as a location. This also helps to better
accommodate the required access visibility splay to the north and provide a stronger gateway
into the settlement. Along the northern boundary from an ecological and biodiversity point of
view, it is also important to include a 5m buffer on the north side of existing hedgerow, ditch,
and tree cover, for enhancement and management purposes, however this area will not
include any built development.
• Southern boundary: This includes the track to allotments and the former care home site.
• Eastern boundary: This follows the title plan.
• Western boundary: This follows the edge of the new of allotment site.
3.7 While these changes will marginally increase the size of the site, they help to facilitate it delivering at
least the anticipated quantum of development, without compromising the ability to retain and
improve the existing important landscape trees, hedges, and ditches, and also ensure that the
biodiversity value of these features can be maximised in the long term.
a) Approximately 175 new dwellings of a mix and type of housing to meet evidenced needs and be
compatible with surrounding development;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
9 | P a g e
3.8 Criteria a) is supported, however there does need to be some flexibility in respect of the total
number of dwellings which can be delivered. Currently two different development options are being
developed, one which reflects the pylons which cross the site as being retained, and a second which
reflects Policy criterion j) showing them undergrounded. At present these options confirm that 175
dwellings are likely to be below the minimum number of dwellings the Site can deliver and in reality,
higher numbers will be achievable in order to make the most efficient use of the land available in
this sustainable location.
3.9 Both Concept Master Plan options seek to retain existing landscape features, primarily the existing
field boundaries. A single point of access is provided to Colchester Road with a main spine road
running through the Site and providing an all modes connection to the north-west corner of the
Cala Homes development.
3.10 To provide a vehicle connection between the eastern half of the Site and the west, it will be necessary
to remove a short central section of the existing hedgerow. This will be kept to a minimum and
compensatory planting will be carried out. Additional pedestrian connectivity has also been
provided to assist the integration of the Care Home land, the Cala development, the new allotments,
and the wider Site.
3.11 Generous areas of landscaping and green space have been included, with green buffers to existing
landscape features throughout. The landscaping will help to establish an appropriate rural character
to the scheme and some separation between the internal development parcels, reflective of the
Site’s edge of settlement location.
3.12 On the western side of the Site a surface water attenuation basin is proposed which can be gravity
fed from the remainder of the development area. This will also be located close to the existing
attenuation basin which serves the Cala development, and the new allotment site to the west,
creating a large natural space, rich in habitat value and adding a tranquil area to the setting of the
new allotments.
3.13 The Promoters architects are currently refining the site option plans to ensure that an efficient use
of the site can be delivered at an appropriate density to reflect the landscape sensitivity of the site,
however, the early indications are that a higher number of dwellings is likely to be deliverable and
as such it is recommended that the figure of approximately 175 dwellings is slightly increased to
approximately 200 dwellings. When the additional design work has been completed, we will provide
the Council with an update of the most realistic site capacity, to help inform the next stage of the
emerging Plan.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
10 | P a g e
b) Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point of vehicle access to
be via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority and
demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety;
3.14 It is noted that criteria (b) of Policy PP24 seems to suggest that the; ‘…point of vehicle access to be via
the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation…’ The existing access to the Cala development is
physically constrained by the existing buildings in Watsham Place and as such it is not considered
that it would be desirable in highway terms for it to serve approximately 260 dwellings.
3.15 As part of the scheme development process, it has therefore been concluded that providing a new
point of access further north along Colchester Road would deliver substantial highway safety and
amenity benefits, reducing the potential for congestion around the junctions of Vine Drive and
Elmstead Road. Additional pedestrian and cycle connections can be provided directly to Colchester
Road, as part of this new access, as well as to the new track to the allotments, in the south-east
corner of the Site frontage as well. A vehicle link to the Cala development is also proposed which
ultimately will create a loop through both sites. This will improve the over permeability of both sites.
3.16 In respect of the location of the new Site access on Colchester Road, a central location is considered
to be the only feasible option to serve the development. This is because there is not scope to locate
the access to the south due to the separation distance required from the Elmstead Road junction
and the controlled crossing, meaning there are no suitable non constrained alternative locations. A
Highway Technical Note and accompanying plans have already been provided to the Planning Policy
Team and further copies can be made available upon request. As the scheme development is
progressed engagement with Essex County Council Highways will be undertaken to help confirm
the technical acceptability of these arrangements.
3.17 It is therefore recommended that criterion b) should be amended to the following:
Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point (s) of vehicle access to be
via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority and
demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety .
3.18 The Promoters would be happy to discuss this or another form of suitable access with the Council.
c) Provide a safe pedestrian access to ensure connectivity within and throughout the site to existing
footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green infrastructure connections and
recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel links and connections to the
settlement;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
11 | P a g e
3.19 This criterion appears to be trying to address three matters, which are generally related, however,
the reference to green infrastructure connections is considered confusing as these connections are
not only associated with accessibility but also green and blue corridors where it may be more
appropriate to discourage public activity from an ecological perspective. Furthermore, there are no
public rights of way crossing, or immediately adjoining the site. It is therefore recommended that
criteria c) is amended as follows:
c) Provide a safe pedestrian and active travel access to ensure connectivity within and throughout the
site and to the settlement and surrounding area . Connections to existing footways and the track to
the allotments and where possible recreational access to the countryside should also be considered .
to existing footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green infrastructure
connections and recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel links and
connections to the settlement;
3.20 The delivery of green infrastructure connections can be secured through the statutory requirements
to deliver biodiversity net gain and the general layout of the development.
3.21 If the reference to green infrastructure connections was intended to suggest that public access
should not only be provided through the urban parts of the development, but also through more
informal rural settings, then this can be explained as part of the supporting text.
d) Contributions towards enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields;
3.22 There is no objection to this particular criterion. While the emerging scheme which is being
developed for the Site will provide the minimum 10% open space requirement currently operated
by the Council, given the size of the development it is unlikely that this will include any formal sports
facilities, and as such it is appropriate that some mitigation should be delivered providing this is not
already captured as part of the Council’s CIL charging schedule.
e) Screening comprising locally appropriate tree belts and/or hedgerows will be required along the
site boundaries to ensure that development is sensitively integrated into the landscape and to
maintain settlement separation;
3.23 This is a reasonable requirement, and the current scheme development is being informed by an
accompanying landscape strategy which seeks to retain existing hedgerows and tree belts with
appropriate buffers and introduce new tree belts and/or hedgerows where necessary along the Site
boundaries to ensure the Site is sensitively integrated into the townscape.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
12 | P a g e
f) Biodiversity enhancement measures should include enhancing hedgerow condition and
establishing grassland habitats along road verges;
3.24 There is no particular objection to this policy criteria, however, given the statutory biodiversity
enhancement requirements which will be secured through the detailed planning application stage
and a statutory biodiversity net gain condition, it is unclear why there is a site specific requirement
for establishing grassland habitats along road verges in this particular location. As such these
comments might be better included in the supporting text of policy where further explanation and
justification can be provided.
3.25 It is therefore considered that unless there is site specific justification available this criterion should
be deleted.
g) Development must conserve, and where appropriate, enhance the significance of heritage assets
(including any contribution made by their settings). Designated heritage assets close to the
allocated site includes five Grade II Listed Buildings as informed by the stage 1 HIA;
3.26 This is in line with national policy and legislative requirements which require heritage assets to be
conserved or enhanced, not conserved and enhanced. It is considered that the Site can be
developed to ensure that the setting of the nearby listed buildings are, as a minimum, preserved.
3.27 It is noted that the Heritage Impact Assessment Sift Methodology (January 2025) classified the site
as not requiring any further investigation at this stage but indicates that a proportionate heritage
impact assessment, desk-based archaeological assessment and potentially trial trenching, should
be part of the planning application stage.
h) The total number of dwellings will be spread between this site and the area currently set aside
for a care home as part of the neighbourhood plan allocation;
This criterion is supported as it will provide clarity in respect of the status of the Neighbourhood
Plan as part of the development plan and the Site’s existing designation for use as a care home.
3.28 Following the original outline permission (Ref: 213507) in January 2024 for the adjoining housing
site, which included permission for a 60 bed care home, the site was marketed and Cala Homes
purchased the residential element, however, very little interest was expressed in the Care Home
site. More recently, in October 2024, a focused marketing exercise commenced for the care home
land. Over twenty operators were contacted directly, however, despite the extensive marketing, only
one operator expressed any serious interest, and after a more detailed review concluded the site
was not suitable for their requirements.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
13 | P a g e
3.29 It is also relevant that the care home land to the rear of the Fire Station was not the only opportunity
for care home provision to be made by the Neighbourhood Plan. At paragraph 16.35, the
Neighbourhood Plan notes this and states: “Whether proposals for care homes come forward will
depend on market factors.” Furthermore, the Council have recently resolved to grant planning
permission (Ref: 240409) at the Croquet Gardens site for 25 Bungalows and a 60-Bed Care Home.
Therefore, the care home land to the rear of the Fire Station is not required or suitable for care
home use to meet any current local need and, as such, there is sufficient justification for its logical
inclusion as part of the residential allocation.
3.30 This is also recognised in the Summary of Sites Evidence (October 2025) evidence base document
as set out in Section 4 below.
i) A new community space must be included within the site and pedestrian access to the adjacent
allotments must be created;
3.31 The Site Promoters would be agreeable to including a community space/land as part of the scheme
development, however, there needs to be a clear vision around what is actually necessary,
proportionate, and justified.
3.32 At the present time, this criterion is considered to be imprecise in respect of the size and type of
community space which is required and is lacking justification.
3.33 While pedestrian access will clearly be provided to the adjacent allotments through the inclusion of
the allotment access track, this can also be secured under criterion c) above.
3.34 Having regard to the limited information in the Infrastructure Audit and Delivery Plan (October 2025)
(IADP), which it is acknowledged does refer to a limited range of community facilities at Table 3.25
(Page 69). However, it does not expand this any further and explain which community facilities there
are a shortage of. It is noted that those facilities listed in the introduction to section seem to relate
to buildings such as community halls and libraries rather than ‘spaces’.
3.35 While the Sustainability Appraisal refers to this as a potential community benefit for residents in the
north of the settlement, it fails to provide any further guidance what is expected.
3.36 The reference in the IADP does not seem to align with the assessment set out in the Settlement
Evidence Stage 1 Document (November 2024). This evidence document includes an analysis of
Wivenhoe (Page 108 onwards) which generally confirms that it is a sustainable location with a good
range of community facilities and local services. This does not suggest a shortage of community
buildings. At Page 109 it states:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
14 | P a g e
“There is numerous community and social infrastructure in Wivenhoe. There is a GP
surgery, dentist surgeries, shops including a One Stop, Co -op and numerous
independent shops. There is a library , three hair salons and three barbers, art galleries.
There are nine public houses/restaurants, four cafes, a fish and chip shop, football
ground, tennis courts, cricket ground, bowls club, allotments and open space provision
including playing fields. Ther e are multiple churches and community halls .” [emphasis
added]
3.37 Under the section on High Level Opportunities (at a settlement level), whilst it suggests that growth
may provide opportunities to enhance local infrastructure, including active travel within the
settlement and beyond, there is no mention of a need for additional community spaces or buildings.
There is, however, reference to the Wivenhoe Green Spaces Community Project which
demonstrates how a mosaic of sites of varying sizes contribute to the green infrastructure of the
town and encourage diversity of wild flowers on green spaces, bringing significant ecological, climate,
and heritage benefits.
3.38 As referred to above, noting that the Council is a CIL charging authority and 25% of CIL receipts will
be transferred directly to Wivenhoe Parish Council to spend on local projects, there does not appear
to be any reasonable justification for this criterion at present.
3.39 Furthermore, criterion d) indicates there is a particular need for contributions towards the
enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields which it is assumed would be
secured separately to CIL, through a Section 106 Agreement. Requiring the Site to deliver a further
additional community space or land as well as a contribution to this existing community recreation
space is not considered reasonable or proportionate to the scale of the proposed development. As
such it is not likely to be compliant with the tests set out in the CIL Regulations without further
appropriate site-specific justification.
3.40 In respect of the current scheme development work, without more precise understanding of what
a community space may be required to deliver it is difficult to understand where it might be best
located on the site, the type and extent of land required, the potential neighbouring impact it may
have and what accessibility requirements may be necessary. It would therefore be extremely helpful
to have further clarification on this matter if the criterion is to be retained.
3.41 In summary, at the present time it is therefore considered that criterion i) should be deleted or
further site specific justification should be provided.
j) Opportunities for undergrounding should be explored
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
15 | P a g e
3.42 There is no objection to this criterion. At the beginning of July 2025 notice was served by the
landowner on Eastern Power Networks Plc that their Wayleave Agreement which crosses the Site,
will be terminated on 15th January 2026. This is the first step towards potentially securing the
ungrounding of the existing overhead power lines. However, at this stage it is not known whether
this is a realistically viable option. As such, as referred to above, two layout options, with and without
undergrounding, have been prepared and are being developed further.
3.43 It should also be noted that there is a mains sewer which follows the alignment of the existing Pylons
which means the two different schemes do not vary dramatically with a linear open space running
through the Site, even if the existing overhead power lines were to be undergrounded. This is not
to say there would not be visual and environmental benefits from fully exploring the opportunity for
undergrounding.
k) Development must discharge attenuated surface water to a receiving waterbody and not to the
combined sewer network, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no other option.
3.44 There is no objection to this criterion. A drainage strategy is being prepared as part of the scheme
development and, as referred to above, a technical note, Flood Risk and Drainage has already been
provided to the Council which confirms that surface water can be discharged to an appropriately
sized attenuation basin on site. A further copy of this technical note can be provided if required.
l) Demonstrate adequate capacity for managing wastewater including proposed phasing
requirements or alternative solutions to the satisfaction of the Council and Anglian Water;
3.45 As referred to above, a drainage strategy to inform the scheme development is being developed
and this will include engagement with Anglian Water.
3.46 Although as a statutory consultee, consultation would undoubtedly take place in connection with
this and other criteria, it is the local planning authority (not Anglian Water or any other body) that
makes the final decision on planning applications, accordingly it is inappropriate for Anglian to be
included in the Policy. References to the need for consultation and capacity issues if they exist can
be included in the support text.
3.47 It is relevant to note that Anglian Water have been raising issues up and down the country, objecting
to development due to insufficient capacity, and these objections are being further tested through
the courts. However, the law is clear that Anglian Water has a duty under the Water Industry Act
1991, to accept connections to the public sewer which they accept; the current issue is where there
is a shortage of headroom in the receiving waste water recycling centre (WRC), the speed at which
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
16 | P a g e
appropriate capacity can be delivered. Clearly, through a plan led system, there should not be a
problem for the sewage undertaker to align its asset management upgrade programme, a five year
cycle, with the housing trajectory proposed through a Local Plan and early engagement by site
promoters as well as the local planning authority will assist with this. This is clearly a matter which
should also be addressed through the infrastructure delivery plan and in turn needs to be linked to
the Council’s housing trajectory.
3.48 In conclusion the reference to Anglian Water in criterion l) should be deleted.
m) A range of measures in addition to prioritising SuDs (Policy EN8) and water efficiency measures
to reduce the risk on impact on the WRC capacity as a result of planned growth including:
i. Removal of unrequired network flows;
ii. Targeted education to include new residents of the development;
iii. Reduction in the demand for potable water.
3.49 It is unclear why this particular criterion has been included given the requirements for a site specific
flood risk assessment and drainage strategy, which would need to be in accordance with Policy EN8
and cover the items listed as i) to iii) above. In addition, as referred to in the comments above in
respect of criterion l) consultation with Anglian Water will be required and the above issues will be
addressed through this mechanism. It will also be linked to the infrastructure delivery plan and
housing trajectory.
3.50 It is considered that it would be more appropriate for this matter to be referred to in the supporting
text rather than as an additional policy element.
3.51 Criterion m) should be deleted.
n) Any site specific infrastructure requirements from the IDP (likely to include education provision,
highway mitigation, water and wastewater and specific community / open space provision).
3.52 There is no objection to this particular criterion, however, any site specific infrastructure
requirements will need to meet the statutory requirements as set out in Regulation 122 of the CIL
Regulations 2010 (as amended) i.e. be:
(a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms;
(b) directly related to the development; and
(c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development .
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
17 | P a g e
3.53 This will be particularly important bearing in mind that the Council is already a CIL charging authority
and there should be no double counting when considering infrastructure and mitigation.
3.54 In the national policy context of producing succinct local plans, as a general good practice comment
including this requirement does seem to be an unnecessary “belt and braces” approach, given the
reference to Policy ST7 in the introduction to the Policy, as well as the requirements set out in the
other criteria discussed above.
3.55 In conclusion it is recommended that criterion n) is deleted.
o) Before granting planning consent, wintering bird surveys will be undertaken at the appropriate
time of year to identify any offsite functional habitat. In the unlikely event that significant numbers
are identified, development must firstly avoid impacts. Where this is not possible, development
must be phased to deliver habitat creation and management either on or off-site to mitigate any
significant impacts. Any such habitat must be provided and fully functional before any
development takes place which would affect significant numbers of SPA birds
3.56 There is no objection to this criterion given the environmental sensitivities of the surrounding
protected sites. As part of the scheme development, ecologically assessments have been carried
out including bird surveys which were undertaken during January, February, and March 2025. These
confirmed that any use of the site by waterfowl was negligible. These results are included in the
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal which has already been provided to the Council. This assessment is
further supported by the surveys previously undertaken in relation to the CALA and Care Home site
which are also still relatively recent, albeit now out of date, but again not identifying any particular
concerns.
3.57 These conclusions are also supported by the Emerging Allocations Biodiversity Assessment as
referred to in Section 5 below.
All development Proposals within Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan Area, will also be determined
against the policies in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan (Adopted May 2019) where they are up
to date and relevant.
3.58 There is no objection to the final paragraph of the Policy which acknowledges the existence of the
Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan, which will remain part of the development plan for the area. This
helpfully confirms that the weight attached to its policies for decision making purposes in the future
will need to be moderated having regard to its age, consistency with the Local Plan strategic policies,
and national planning policy at the time of the determination of any future planning application
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
18 | P a g e
PP24 Summary
3.59 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. While the above section includes some relatively detailed
commentary in respect of the particular criteria and wording of Policy PP24, these are not intended
to be a criticism, but a positive review to assist the Council with the drafting of the forthcoming
version of the Policy and supporting text to be included in the Regulation19 submission version of
the Plan, to help ensure that the Plan can be found sound on examination with limited modification.
3.60 A track change version of Policy PP24 has been provided at Appendix B capturing the recommended
amendments set out above. In conclusion this representation supports Policy PP24 subject to the
recommended refinements and minor amendment to the Site area as indicated at Appendix A,
ensuring flexibility, clarity, and deliverability of the Site in the early part of the Plan period.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
19 | P a g e
4. POLICY GN5, SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL AND EVIDENCE BASE
Policy GN5: Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace
4.1 It is noted that the emerging Plan, includes Policy GN5: Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace. This
policy requires that the Natural England standard of 8 hectares per 1000 head of population be
applied where it is necessary to provide alternative greenspace as the result of a Habitat Regulations
Assessment. It is proposed that the policy wording should be reviewed to allow flexibility in the
application of this ratio, as opposed to an arbitrary calculation, and consideration should be given to
only applying it strategic scale development for example, over 1,000 dwellings.
4.2 On the basis that we would anticipate that an HRA for this particular site (Policy PP24) would be likely
to identify an impact on locally sensitive sites, we would suggest that a further consideration should
be given as to how the Council anticipate this standard might be delivered, noting that the direct
application of this standard to the Site would require an additional area of 3.36 ha of Greenspace to
be provided.
4.3 Such a requirement in addition to the existing land take to meet open space standards, on site SUDs
and on site BNG, would result in a significant reduction in the current housing potential, making the
current policy proposal for 175 dwellings unrealistic. This standard may also have a serious impact
on the viability on this Site and other similar proposed allocations
4.4 Furthermore, sites in Colchester do of course make RAMs contributions to seek to manage
recreational disturbance pressures, so again, this is a factor that should be taken into account
alongside the Natural England ratio which may not consider local factors such as this and effectively
result in double counting in conflict with the CIL Regulations.
Sustainability Appraisal Report (February 2025)
4.5 Both the Site and the wider allocation (PP24) have been considered within the evidence base
documents to the emerging Local Plan, including the Sustainability Appraisal Report (February 2025)
(the SA) which assesses whether the emerging Local Plan will help achieve sustainable development
when compared with reasonable alternatives.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
20 | P a g e
4.6 The SA confirms that Wivenhoe is a sustainable settlement and has good infrastructure provision
and is one of the four largest towns beyond the City of Colchester. However, it also indicates that the
proportion of growth directed to Wivenhoe and West Mersea is lower than the other two larger
settlements of Marks Tey and Tiptree owing to the internationally important biodiversity
designations.
4.7 At Table 5.36, a summary of the SA findings in respect of Policy PP24 is provided and expanded upon
at Paragraphs 5.323 to 5.329. It is considered that this provides a fair assessment of the Policy based
on the existing evidence base. It is noted that the conclusion is that no recommendations are
proposed for any changes to the Policy. In respect of the assessment, some of the areas where
negligible effects have been recorded, for example in respect of the historic environment (SA
Objective 7), Biodiversity and Geodiversity (SA Objective 8) and Landscape (SA Objective 9) a higher
score may well be achieved following the completion of the Site specific technical assessments
currently being undertaken by the Promoters, which will provide further detail and clarification on
the potential positive mitigation which can be delivered.
4.8 In conclusion, it is considered that the SA provides a robust assessment of the proposed allocations
and polices in the emerging plan. It has considered a comprehensive range of reasonable
alternatives, identified suitable and relevant options, and as such, is supported.
Summary of Sites Evidence (October 2025)
4.9 As part of the evidence base for the emerging Local Plan, the Council have produced a Summary of
Sites Evidence (October 2025) which contains a summary of the sites assessed as part of developing
the new Local Plan for housing and employment. These sites were collated via a ‘Call for sites’
exercise or a desktop review, with sites then assessed using the Strategic Land Availability
Assessment (SLAA). The Summary report also confirms that in bringing forward site allocation
choices within the Preferred Options Local Plan, other evidence base documents were used to
inform the suitability of sites.
4.10 The Site is considered under the name ‘Land North of the Fire Station’ Wivenhoe (Site Ref: 10755)
along with the other site submissions for the settlement. As part of the assessment the submitted
Site has been extended to include the ‘Care Home Land’ to the south. This amendment is supported
by the Promoters, however as referred to above a further modest increase in the site area as
discussed above and identified on the red line plan at Appendix A would also be beneficial.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
21 | P a g e
4.11 While the assessment acknowledges that the proposed allocation encroaches into the coalescence
area designated in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan, it helpfully acknowledges that the
encroachment is less than other proposals. It would be useful if the assessment were to highlight
that the allocation does not extend any further north along Colchester Road into the coalescence
break area than the northern boundary of the existing settlement around Feedhams Close on the
west side of Colchester Road when this report is updated next. It will also be necessary for it to reflect
the revised red line plan included at Appendix A.
4.12 The assessment also helpfully acknowledges that:
“The site is adjacent to one of the neighbourhood plan allocations and development can
be planned to complement that development, including delivering some of the homes
allocated on part of the existing allocation set aside for a care home, which is no lon ger
needed owing to the proposal for a care home on an alternative site in Wivenhoe. Access
can be made to the allotments to be delivered as part of the existing allocation
(currently with outline consent).”
4.13 This clarification is supported and considered helpful.
Emerging Allocations Biodiversity Assessment
4.14 The emerging allocations biodiversity assessment has undertaken a review of the proposed
allocation which is set out on page 60 of the report. The harm scoring is noted as:
“Little/no harm – the site has limited natural habitat value”
4.15 This assessment is supported and the general commentary is considered to be a fair reflection of
the Sites biodiversity value and potential, having regard to the site-specific ecological, arboricultural,
and landscape technical work which has recently been completed by the Site Promoters.
Heritage Impact Assessment Sift (January 2025)
4.16 The Heritage Impact Assessment Sift Methodology (January 2025) was a desk-based assessment of
each site to identify any heritage assets with the potential to be affected by their allocation. Following
the sift, three levels of further heritage impact assessment are recommended depending on the
potential impact of the allocation of a site on the historic environment. These were categorised as:
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
22 | P a g e
• No further assessment: (the allocation of the site has been assessed to have no effect on the
significance of any heritage assets);
• Proforma Heritage Impact Assessment; and
• Detailed Heritage Impact Assessment.
4.17 The Land North of the Fire Station was assessed to fall within the first category, no further
assessment required and this conclusion is supported given the limited proximity of the nearest
designated heritage assets.
4.18 It is acknowledged that the site assessment indicates that a heritage statement will be required to
inform the layout of the site and scale of development, given the listed buildings in Colchester Road.
It is also noted that the assessment indicates that a desk-based archaeological assessment will be
required, potentially supported by trial trenching.
Colchester Infrastructure Audit and Delivery Plan, October 2025 (IADP)
4.19 The IADP at Table 2-3 indicates the planned housing growth over the plan period, for Wivenhoe
years 1-5 there are 175 houses planned. The opportunity for the Site to come forward early in the
plan period is supported and its ability to contribute fully to the Council’s ability to demonstrate a
five year housing land supply at the point of adoption is welcomed. As referred to elsewhere in this
consultation response, the Promoters are actively working towards the submission of an outline
application later this year (2026) to ensure that this delivery timetable is not delayed.
4.20 The above further demonstrates the suitability, availability, and deliverability of the Site for
residential development.
4.21 Appendix A of the IADP at Project ID 159 Transport, under Active Travel identifies the Wivenhoe
Mobility Hub as Phase 2, delivery 2029-2033, at an unfunded cost of £506,880 and continues under
the Funding Sources
Funding not secured. Developer funding expected from S106 and/or S278. Potential grant funding
routes include BSIP and LuF Proposed Funding Split - 100% contribution from preferred
allocations - 0% contribution from reference case developments - 0% contribut ion from external
grants.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
23 | P a g e
4.22 Clearly this a project which will not only benefit the future occupants of the Policy PP24 allocation,
but also the existing residents of Wivenhoe and the wider area. From the table it is unclear which
allocations are expected to contribute to this particular infrastructure upgrade. Having regard to the
CIL Tests what the reasonable and propionate financial contribution would be expected from the
development allocations, it is assumed that the reference to ‘0% contribution from reference case
developments ’ means this will be pooled contribution and a modest contribution is that would be
expected as a from development of the Site (Policy PP24).

Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
24 | P a g e
5. CONCLUSION
5.1 Manor Oak Homes and Mr Charles Gooch welcome the proposed inclusion of the Land Northwest
of the Fire Station as an allocation in the emerging Preferred Options Local Plan and support the
inclusion of Policy PP24 in the Plan. They welcome the opportunity to work with Planning Officers to
further refine the Policy and ensure that the Site is both a developable and deliverable housing
opportunity and can be delivered in in the early part of the plan period, helping the Council
demonstrate a five year housing land supply upon adoption.
5.2 Wivenhoe is a sustainable settlement and is one of the four largest towns beyond the City of
Colchester and an appropriate location to direct development in accordance with the Council’s
proposed development strategy which is supported along with the robust approach adopted by the
Sustainability Appraisal.
5.3 The draft Plan confirms that Wivenhoe benefits from a good range of infrastructure, including a
mainline train station, GP surgery, two primary schools, numerous shops and restaurants, and
abundant open space provision. It also benefits from public transport connections to Colchester
and a good cycle and footpath network which provide good connections to the University of Essex
amongst other destinations. As such, the Town can be acknowledged as a sustainable location, in
line with the Plans development strategy for the accommodation of further growth. This is
welcomed.
5.4 It is the Promoter’s intention to work up a formal pre-application submission to help further develop
the details of the Site proposals ahead of the potential submission of an outline application later in
the year, which will help to confirm that the Site is developable and provide a clearer indication of
when housing delivery will be likely to commence.
5.5 The Promoters consider that this represents an exciting opportunity for them to deliver a high
quality housing scheme which responds to the established environmental character of the
settlement edge and provides a range of modern homes in a beautiful, green, and sustainable
location, to meet the needs of the growing local community. Delivering a development which will
foster a strong sense of community and promote healthy and sustainable life styles, with a lasting
legacy and sense of pride, is a key objective.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
25 | P a g e
5.6 While this represent includes some relatively detailed commentary in respect of the particular
criteria and wording of Policy PP24, these are not intended to be a criticism, but a positive review to
assist the Council with the drafting of the forthcoming version of the Policy and supporting text to
be included in the Regulation19 submission version of the Plan, to help ensure that the Plan can be
found sound on examination with limited modification.
5.7 In summary, the Promoters support the Plan and Sustainability Appraisal along with the Council’s
assessment that the Site is suitable, available, and achievable within the plan period. Its early delivery
will also strengthen the Plan’s housing trajectory and the future five year housing land supply. This
representation supports Policy PP24 subject to the recommended refinements to the wording
recommended in Section 3 above and captured in track changes version of the Policy included at
Appendix B, as well minor amendment to the Site area (increased to 8.828 hectares) as indicated in
the Plan at Appendix A.
5.8 Inclusion of these amendments will help to ensure flexibility, clarity, and this representation aims to
confirm the deliverability of the Site in the early part of the Plan period.
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
26 | P a g e
Appendix A - Revised Site Plan (Red Line) – SLP-01 P4
Proposed Amended Site Area


Revised Site Area Approximately 8.828 hectares

Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
27 | P a g e
Appendix B – Recommended Amendments to Policy
PP24
Policy PP24: Land Northwest of the Fire Station, Wivenhoe
In addition to the infrastructure and mitigation requirements identified in Policy ST 7 and subject to
compliance with all other relevant policies, development will be supported on land within the area
identified on the policies map which provides:
a. Approximately 200 new dwellings of a mix and type of housing to meet evidenced needs and be
compatible with surrounding development;
b. Safe and suitable site access to required highway design standards and point(s) of vehicle access
to be via the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan allocation, to be agreed with the Highway Authority
and demonstration that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway capacity or safety;
c. Provide a safe pedestrian and active travel access to ensure connectivity within and throughout
the site and to the settlement and surrounding area. Connections to existing footways and the
track to the allotments and where possible recreational access to the countryside should also be
considered. to existing footways and any Public Rights of Way. Ensure provision of green
infrastructure connections and recreational access to the countryside, also securing active travel
links and connections to the settlement;
d. Contributions towards enhancement of the quality and value of King George V Playing Fields;
e. Screening comprising locally appropriate tree belts and/or hedgerows will be required along the
site boundaries to ensure that development is sensitively integrated into the landscape and to
maintain settlement separation;
f. Biodiversity enhancement measures should include enhancing hedgerow condition and
establishing grassland habitats along road verges;
g. Development must conserve, and where appropriate, enhance the significance of heritage assets
(including any contribution made by their settings). Designated heritage assets close to the
allocated site includes five Grade II Listed Buildings as informed by the stage 1 HIA;
h. The total number of dwellings will be spread between this site and the area currently set aside
for a care home as part of the neighbourhood plan allocation;
Colchester Local Plan Reg 18 | Wivenhoe Policy PP24
28 | P a g e
i. A new community space must be included within the site and pedestrian access to the adjacent
allotments must be created;
j. Opportunities for undergrounding should be explored;
k. Development must discharge attenuated surface water to a receiving waterbody and not to the
combined sewer network, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no other option.
l. Demonstrate adequate capacity for managing wastewater including proposed phasing
requirements or alternative solutions to the satisfaction of the Council and Anglian Water;
m. A range of measures in addition to prioritising SuDs (Policy EN8) and water efficiency measures
to reduce the risk on impact on the WRC capacity as a result of planned growth including:
i. Removal of unrequired network flows;
ii. Targeted education to include new residents of the development;
iii. Reduction in the demand for potable water.
n. Any site specific infrastructure requirements from the IDP (likely to include education provision,
highway mitigation, water and wastewater and specific community / open space provision).
o. Before granting planning consent, wintering bird surveys will be undertaken at the appropriate
time of year to identify any offsite functional habitat. In the unlikely event that significant numbers
are identified, development must firstly avoid impacts. Where this is not possible, development
must be phased to deliver habitat creation and management either on or off-site to mitigate any
significant impacts. Any such habitat must be provided and fully functional before any
development takes place which would affect significant numbers of SPA birds.
All development Proposals within Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan Area, will also be determined against
the policies in the Wivenhoe Neighbourhood Plan (Adopted May 2019) where they are up to date and
relevant.