Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025
Search representations
Results for Turner Morum LLP search
New searchObject
Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025
Policy NZ1: Net Zero Carbon Development (in operation)
Representation ID: 13572
Received: 14/01/2026
Respondent: Turner Morum LLP
The viability analysis submitted by Newmark provides an insufficient level of detail to allow it to be scrutinised. Consequently the viability conclusions cannot be relied upon, which fundamentally undermine the Council's Net Zero policy aspirations and affordable housing targets. A detailed report looking at the Newmark assessment has been separately submitted
The viability analysis submitted by Newmark provides an insufficient level of detail to allow it to be scrutinised. Consequently the viability conclusions cannot be relied upon, which fundamentally undermine the Council's Net Zero policy aspirations and affordable housing targets. A detailed report looking at the Newmark assessment has been separately submitted
Object
Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025
Policy H2: Affordable Housing
Representation ID: 14256
Received: 14/01/2026
Respondent: Turner Morum LLP
The viability analysis submitted by Newmark provides an insufficient level of detail to allow it to be scrutinised. Consequently the viability conclusions cannot be relied upon, which fundamentally undermine the Council's Net Zero policy aspirations and affordable housing targets. A detailed report looking at the Newmark assessment has been separately submitted.
The viability analysis submitted by Newmark provides an insufficient level of detail to allow it to be scrutinised. Consequently the viability conclusions cannot be relied upon, which fundamentally undermine the Council's Net Zero policy aspirations and affordable housing targets. A detailed report looking at the Newmark assessment has been separately submitted
Object
Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025
Policy ST7: Infrastructure Delivery and Impact Mitigation
Representation ID: 14257
Received: 14/01/2026
Respondent: Turner Morum LLP
The Newmark viability conclusions appear to be significantly over-stated due to significantly
over-stated affordable revenues, significantly under-stated development costs – and
Benchmark Land Value assumptions that are far too low, and which would risk sterilising
numerous developments in this location. (Reps logged to NZ1 and H2)
The viability analysis submitted by Newmark provides an insufficient level of detail to allow it to be scrutinised. Consequently the viability conclusions cannot be relied upon, which fundamentally undermine the Council's Net Zero policy aspirations and affordable housing targets. A detailed report looking at the Newmark assessment has been separately submitted
