Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025
Search representations
Results for The 2008 Angora Bare Trust search
New searchSupport
Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025
Policy PP29: Land East of School Road, Copford
Representation ID: 13087
Received: 13/01/2026
Respondent: The 2008 Angora Bare Trust
Agent: Cheffins
On behalf of The 2008 Angora Bare Trusts, this representation supports proposed allocation PP29: Land East of School Road, Copford, confirming the site is available and deliverable within the plan period. The landowners are committed to working collaboratively with adjacent landowners to provide a comprehensive masterplan.
The allocation boundary should be extended marginally reflecting the definitive PROW alignment to enable deliverable connections to be designed and secured through the masterplanning process. Flexibility is also sought in criterion (d) to allow either replacement of the village hall or its retention and refurbishment with associated improvements, supporting timely delivery and community benefit.
On behalf of the landowner, The Angora Bare Trusts, the proposed residential allocation PP29: Land East of School Road, Copford is supported and we can confirm that the site is available and deliverable within the plan period.
Separate representations are being submitted by Welbeck Land on behalf of one of the other landowners, however, both parties are committed to bringing forwarded a comprehensive masterplan for the draft allocation. Preliminary discussions have also been held with Copford with Easthorpe Parish Council (owners of the majority of the land that lies immediately to the north of our client’s land), who are seeking to work collaboratively on this proposal.
As part of this representation of support and commitment to demonstrating deliverability of the site, an indicative Parameter Plan has been submitted to demonstrate key principles for development on our client’s parcel, which include indicative locations for development parcels providing a continuation of the linear settlement pattern fronting School Road, green infrastructure, blue infrastructure, open space and parking for the adjacent village hall.
The submitted Parameter Plan illustrates how the development could provide direct pedestrian links to the existing Public Right of Way (PROW) which runs parallel to the site. This would safeguard connectivity to the wider footpath network and support recreational access to the countryside and active travel connections, consistent with the draft allocation’s objectives.
However, as drafted and mapped, the allocation boundary does not fully encompass the land required to achieve criterion c. of the draft allocation policy, which seeks safe pedestrian connectivity to existing footways and any public rights of way. The accompanying PROW plan (drawing no. 4007778) demonstrates that the definitive alignment of the PROW adjacent to our client’s parcel to both the south and east lies slightly beyond the current allocation boundary as shown on the policies map. To ensure that future development can deliver compliant and direct links to the PROW network, the allocation should be extended marginally to reflect the correct position of the PROW and to enable deliverable connections to be designed and secured through the masterplanning process.
It is also proposed to provide additional connections to the existing playground and village hall, ensuring that existing community facilities and spaces are connected with the proposed development. As part of the key development principles shown on the indicative Parameter Plan, it is also proposed to update the existing footbridge to the north east corner of the site boundary, further enhancing integrated recreational links to the countryside.
A safe and suitable access to our client’s parcel can be achieved off School Road to the south of the village hall and a provisional access design has been prepared to demonstrate this.
Green buffers along the site boundaries will ensure that the development is sensitively integrated into the landscape and reflect the rural character of the area.
It is noted that criterion d. states:
“A replacement village hall must be delivered within the site, well connected to new homes and existing homes in Copford.”
Following informal discussions with Copford with Easthorpe Parish Council, it is understood that the existing village hall is held for charitable purposes, with legal title vested in the Official Custodian for Charities on behalf of Copford Village Hall. This ownership structure does not preclude change; however, proposals involving relocation, disposal or replacement of the existing village hall can be subject to charity trustee governance and compliance with charities law safeguards for dealings with charity land. In practical terms, this can introduce additional procedural steps and timing dependencies outside the direct control of developers.
Furthermore, Paragraph 98 of the NPPF expects plans to guard against the unnecessary loss of valued community facilities and to ensure established facilities are able to develop and modernise and are retained for the benefit of the community. In this context, a policy requirement for a wholesale replacement of the existing village hall is unnecessarily prescriptive where equivalent or improved outcomes could be achieved through the retention and improvement of the existing village hall.
To support the allocation’s effectiveness and timely delivery, it is therefore requested that criterion (d) is amended to provide appropriate flexibility as to how the village hall objective is achieved, without altering the overall quantum or intent of the allocation. Having informally discussed our proposal, the Parish Council has acknowledged the alternative option to retain and refurbish the existing village hall, alongside additional off-street parking provision (which could be accommodated on our client’s land, as shown on the indicative Parameter Plan) to help address existing congestion and on-street parking pressures on School Road at peak times i.e. school drop-off and collection, which is a known and prevalent issue in the village. This approach would secure tangible community benefit while reducing the risk of delay associated with a mandatory replacement solution. It is therefore proposed that criterion d. is revised to allow either replacement of the village hall or its retention/refurbishment with associated improvements, to be agreed through the comprehensive masterplanning process in consultation with the Parish Council and the hall trustees. Criterion d. could therefore be reworded as follows:
“A village hall solution to be agreed through the masterplanning process in consultation with Copford with Easthorpe Parish Council and the village hall trustees. This may be achieved either through (i) the delivery of a replacement village hall or (ii) the retention and refurbishment of the existing village hall together with associated improvements (such as enhanced parking provision).”