Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Search representations

Results for Historic England -East of England search

New search New search

Comment

Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Policy PP11: Europit Site, Colchester

Representation ID: 11624

Received: 24/12/2025

Respondent: Historic England -East of England

Representation Summary:

Effects uncertain. A full Heritage Impact Assessment will be necessary to inform the next draft of the Local Plan. If the Council plans to rely on the 2021 HIA, we recommend confirming that it remains relevant and updating it where needed so that it reflects the current site boundary, policy wording, and best practice guidance.
If, once prepared, the evidence shows that harm cannot be adequately mitigated, the site should not be allocated.

Full text:

The site is located within the setting of the Colchester Area 1 Conservation Area, numerous listed buildings, and the St Botolph's Augustinian Priory Scheduled Monument (LEN 1013764).
Due to this sensitivity, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be essential before the next draft of the Plan. This assessment should determine whether the site is suitable from a historic environment perspective and identify any mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement to be incorporated into criterion ‘f’. However, it is unclear from the information provided whether a new HIA is planned for this site. The Sift report suggests that the Council may rely on a 2021 HIA, but it is not evident whether that earlier assessment has informed the current site boundary or the content of Policy PP11.

Initial assessment

Effects uncertain. A full Heritage Impact Assessment will be necessary to inform the next draft of the Local Plan. If the Council plans to rely on the 2021 HIA, we recommend confirming that it remains relevant and updating it where needed so that it reflects the current site boundary, policy wording, and best practice guidance.
If, once prepared, the evidence shows that harm cannot be adequately mitigated, the site should not be allocated.

Comment

Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Policy PP14: Gas Works and Hythe Scrap Yard Site, Colchester

Representation ID: 11625

Received: 24/12/2025

Respondent: Historic England -East of England

Representation Summary:

The site is located adjacent to the Distillery Pond Conservation Area and Grade II listed Hull House immediately east of laundry.

Initial assessment

While development at this site may be acceptable, a Heritage Impact Assessment (Proforma) will be essential to confirm the site’s suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criterion ‘i’.

Full text:

The site is located adjacent to the Distillery Pond Conservation Area and Grade II listed Hull House immediately east of laundry.

Initial assessment

While development at this site may be acceptable, a Heritage Impact Assessment (Proforma) will be essential to confirm the site’s suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criterion ‘i’.

Comment

Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Policy PP15: Hawkins Road, Colchester

Representation ID: 11626

Received: 24/12/2025

Respondent: Historic England -East of England

Representation Summary:

These sites are located adjacent to the Colchester, Hythe Conservation Area, and numerous Grade II listed buildings.
Initial assessment
While development at these sites may be acceptable, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be necessary to confirm its suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘g’, ‘f’ and ‘d’ of the corresponding policies.

Full text:

These sites are located adjacent to the Colchester, Hythe Conservation Area, and numerous Grade II listed buildings.
Initial assessment
While development at these sites may be acceptable, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be necessary to confirm its suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘g’, ‘f’ and ‘d’ of the corresponding policies.

Comment

Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Policy PP16: Coal Yard Site, Colchester

Representation ID: 11627

Received: 24/12/2025

Respondent: Historic England -East of England

Representation Summary:

These sites are located adjacent to the Colchester, Hythe Conservation Area, and numerous Grade II listed buildings.
Initial assessment
While development at these sites may be acceptable, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be necessary to confirm its suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘g’, ‘f’ and ‘d’ of the corresponding policies.

Full text:

These sites are located adjacent to the Colchester, Hythe Conservation Area, and numerous Grade II listed buildings.
Initial assessment
While development at these sites may be acceptable, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be necessary to confirm its suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘g’, ‘f’ and ‘d’ of the corresponding policies.

Comment

Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Policy OA2: Land East of Hawkins Road Opportunity Area

Representation ID: 11628

Received: 24/12/2025

Respondent: Historic England -East of England

Representation Summary:

These sites are located adjacent to the Colchester, Hythe Conservation Area, and numerous Grade II listed buildings.
Initial assessment
While development at these sites may be acceptable, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be necessary to confirm its suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘g’, ‘f’ and ‘d’ of the corresponding policies.

Full text:

These sites are located adjacent to the Colchester, Hythe Conservation Area, and numerous Grade II listed buildings.
Initial assessment
While development at these sites may be acceptable, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be necessary to confirm its suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘g’, ‘f’ and ‘d’ of the corresponding policies.

Comment

Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Policy OA3: Magdalen Street Opportunity Area

Representation ID: 11629

Received: 24/12/2025

Respondent: Historic England -East of England

Representation Summary:

The site is adjacent to the New Town Conservation Area, and three Grade II listed buildings.
Initial assessment
While development at this site may be acceptable, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be necessary to confirm its suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criterion ‘g’ of the policy.

Full text:

The site is adjacent to the New Town Conservation Area, and three Grade II listed buildings.
Initial assessment
While development at this site may be acceptable, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be necessary to confirm its suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criterion ‘g’ of the policy.

Comment

Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Policy PEP2 Knowledge Gateway

Representation ID: 11630

Received: 24/12/2025

Respondent: Historic England -East of England

Representation Summary:

Effects uncertain. We agree that a proforma Heritage Impact Assessment will be essential to determine whether the site is suitable from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘g’ of Policy PEP2.

Full text:

The site is located partially within the Wivenhoe Park Registered Park and Garden (LEN 1000371), and potentially within the wider setting of a number of other designated heritage assets, including the Group of barrows at Annan Road Scheduled Monument (LEN 1464139). Development has potential for direct impact and indirect impact on setting of Registered Park and Garden and Scheduled Monument.

Initial assessment

Effects uncertain. We agree that a proforma Heritage Impact Assessment will be essential to determine whether the site is suitable from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘g’ of Policy PEP2.

Object

Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Policy PP17: Land South of A12, Marks Tey Growth Area

Representation ID: 11631

Received: 24/12/2025

Respondent: Historic England -East of England

Representation Summary:

Development within the setting of designated heritage assets would result in a loss of significance. Marks Tey Hall Scheduled Monument, and GII listed building, the GII* Marks Tey Hall South Barn , and GII listed Barn To North West Of Marks Tey Hall, mitigation is unlikely to be effective because the proposals would surround on all sides, and nature of the development means that any measures would have limited success. A full HIA will be essential to determine whether the site can be allocated. If this confirms that harm cannot be adequately mitigated, the site should not be allocated.

Full text:

We have serious concerns regarding the potential allocation of this site which includes the Medieval moat at Marks Tey Hall Scheduled Monument (LEN 1477794), and Grade II listed building, the Grade II* Marks Tey Hall South Barn (‎1224577), and Grade II listed Barn To North West Of Marks Tey Hall (‎1266768), and is within the wider setting of other Grade II listed buildings, including Doggets Hammer Farm (1266767), as well as the Copford Green Conservation Area.

Initial assessment

This site should not be allocated. Development within the setting of these designated heritage assets would almost certainly result in a loss of significance. In the case of Marks Tey Hall Scheduled Monument (LEN 1477794), and Grade II listed building, the Grade II* Marks Tey Hall South Barn (‎1224577), and Grade II listed Barn To North West Of Marks Tey Hall (‎1266768), mitigation is unlikely to be effective because the proposals would surround these assets on all sides, and the nature of the development (housing) means that any measures would have only very limited success. A full Heritage Impact Assessment will be essential to determine whether the site can be allocated. If this confirms that harm cannot be adequately mitigated, the site should not be allocated.

Comment

Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Policy PP18: Land North of A120, Marks Tey Growth Area

Representation ID: 11632

Received: 24/12/2025

Respondent: Historic England -East of England

Representation Summary:

This large site is located within the wider setting of a large number of listed buildings including two Grade listed churches.
Initial assessment
A full Heritage Impact Assessment will be essential to determine whether the site can be allocated, and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘l’ of Policy PP12.

Full text:

This large site is located within the wider setting of a large number of listed buildings including two Grade listed churches.
Initial assessment
A full Heritage Impact Assessment will be essential to determine whether the site can be allocated, and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘l’ of Policy PP12.

Comment

Colchester City Council Preferred Options Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation 2025

Policy PEP5 Land South of A12, Marks Tey

Representation ID: 11633

Received: 24/12/2025

Respondent: Historic England -East of England

Representation Summary:

This site is located within the wider setting of four Grade II Listed Buildings, and Marks Tey Hall Scheduled Monument (LEN 1477794).
Initial assessment
While development at this site may be acceptable, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be essential to confirm the site’s suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘c’ of the policy.

Full text:

This site is located within the wider setting of four Grade II Listed Buildings, and Marks Tey Hall Scheduled Monument (LEN 1477794).
Initial assessment
While development at this site may be acceptable, a full Heritage Impact Assessment will be essential to confirm the site’s suitability from a historic environment perspective and to identify appropriate mitigation measures or opportunities for enhancement. The resulting recommendations should then be incorporated into criteria ‘c’ of the policy.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.